This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice on dead person-Order is quashed and set aside.[S. 147, 159, 292B, Art. 226]

Utpala Pradeep Jain v. ACIT (2023) 295 Taxman 322 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Capital work-in-progress-Change of opinion-Audit objection-No fresh tangible material-Order of Tribunal is affirmed.[S.143(3) 148 260A]

PCIT v. Network Programme India Ltd. (2023) 295 Taxman 335 / (2024) 461 ITR 37(Delhi)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Capital work-in-progress-Change of opinion-Audit objection-No fresh tangible material-Order of Tribunal is affirmed.[S.143(3) 148 260A]

PCIT v. Network Programme India Ltd. (2023) 295 Taxman 335/(2024)461 ITR 37 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Special economic zones-Explanation was furnished in the course of assessment proceedings-Notice and order disposing the objection is quashed.[S.10AA, 148, Art. 226]

Amneal Pharmaceuticals (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2023) 295 Taxman 197 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Unexplained investments-Failure to provide alleged SEBI Investigation report-Syncom Formulations Limited-Long term gains-Assessment order is set aside-Remanded back to Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) with a direction to make available to assessee a copy of report of SEBI relied upon in reasons to believe for re-opening of assessment. [S. 10(38) 69, 144B, 148, Art. 226]

Ankur V. Bankda v. ACIT (2023) 295 Taxman 430 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Interest on borrowed capital-Advance of amount to sister concern and associate concerns without charging interests-Commercial expediency-Notice and order disposing the objection is quashed and set aside. [S. 36(1)(iii), 148, Art. 226]

Vaman Prestressing Co. (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2023) 295 Taxman 252/(2024) 461 ITR 192 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Depreciation-Goodwill-Query raised and reply was filed-Issue was considered in the course of assessment proceedings-Audit-Even if it is an error that the Assessing Officer discovered, still the error discovered on a reconsideration of the same material does not give him power to reopen the assessment-Change of opinion-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 32, 148, Art. 226]

Sterlite Technologies Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023) 459 ITR 83 / 295 Taxman 488 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Capital gains-Full value of consideration-Stamp valuation-Capital gains were calculated by assessee by taking circle-rate-Provisions of section 50C is not applicable-No reason between material and revenue’s belief on income escapement-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 45, 50C,54EC 148, Art. 226]

Manujendra Shah v. CIT (2023) 295 Taxman 374/(2024) 471 ITR 788 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Capital gains-Slump sale-Borrowed satisfaction-Difference in valuation-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed and set aside. [S. 45, 54EC, 148, 154, Art. 226]

Kunal Kiran Sheth v. ACIT (2023) 295 Taxman 292/( 2024) 471 ITR 520 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Bad debt-Provision for bad and doubtful debts-Schedule bank-No failure to disclose material facts-Order of the Tribunal is affirmed. [S. 36(1)(viia), 148, 260A]

CIT v. Canara Bank (2023) 155 taxmann.com 289/ 456 ITR 316 (Karn)(HC) Editorial: SLP of Revenue is dismissed, CIT v. Canara Bank (2023) 295 Taxman 228/(2024) 460 ITR 6 (SC)