S. 28(i) : Business loss-Working capital-Allowable as business loss. [S. 37(1)]
Dy. CIT v. Global Wool Alliance Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 100 ITR 12 (SN) (Kol)(Trib)S. 28(i) : Business loss-Working capital-Allowable as business loss. [S. 37(1)]
Dy. CIT v. Global Wool Alliance Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 100 ITR 12 (SN) (Kol)(Trib)S. 28(i) : Business loss-Fluctuation in foreign exchange-Restatement of outstanding liabilities on revenue items-Allowable as revenue expenditure. [S. 37(1)]
Herbalife International India Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 100 ITR 456 (Bang.) (Trib)S. 28(i) : Business loss-Real estate business-Purchase of land-Litigation-Stock in trade-Allowable as business loss.
Amarnath Aggarwal Builders Pvt. Ltd v. Dy. CIT (2022) 99 ITR 194 (Amritsar) (Trib)S. 28(i) : Business loss-Business expenditure-Commodities trading-Non-recovery of purchase cost of goods paid to National Spot Exchange (NSEL)-Allowable as business loss [S. 37(1), 145]
Dy. CIT v. Cello Pens & Stationary (P) Ltd. (2022) 215 TTJ 486 / 210 DTR 53 (Mum)(Trib)S. 28(i) : Business loss-Forward contract-Hedging transactions through banks-Loss allowable as business loss and not speculation loss. [S. 43(5), 73]
Dy. CIT v. Mahendra Brothers Exports Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 99 ITR 537 (Mum)(Trib)S. 28(i): Business loss-Operationalising a sick company-Loss is allowable as business loss. [S. 37(1)]
ITO v. Roj Enterprises (P) Ltd. (2022) 219 TTJ 70 (UO) (Pune)(Trib)S. 28(i) : Business loss-Running of sick company-Business loss allowable as deduction. [S. 37(1)]
ITO v. Roj Enerprises (P) Ltd. (2022) 219 TTJ 70 (UO)(Pune)(Trib)S. 28(i) : Business income-Capital gains-Purchase and sale of agricultural lands-Transactions were adventure in nature of trade-Assessable as business income. [S. 2(13), 45]
Dilip Bhattu Karanjule v. ITO (2022)100 ITR 59 (SN) (Pune)(Trib)S. 24 : Income from house property-Deductions-Interest on housing loan-Jointly borrowed with husband-Interest allowable as deduction. [S. 24(b)]
ITO v. Mamta Rajivkumar Agarwal (Smt.) (2022)100 ITR 17 (SN)(Ahd) (Trib)S. 23 : Income from house property-Annual value-Unsold units in commercial complex held as stock-in-trade-Notional value cannot be assessed-Reassessment beyond four years held to be not valid-Reassessment with in four years and assessment completed under section 143(1)-Reassessment is valid. [S. 22, 23(5), 24(a), 143(1)(143(3), 147, 148]
Krishna Build Home (P) Ltd. v. ITO (2022) 219 TTJ 165 (Jaipur)(Trib)