This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 45 : Capital gains-Retirement-Firm-Excess of amount due-Goodwill-No discussion in the judgement-Matter remanded to the High court for reconsideration.

PCIT v. R. F. Nangrani HUF (2023)454 ITR 426/ 293 Taxman 511/ 332 CTR 510/ 225 DTR 217 (SC) Editorial : Order of High Court is set aside and remanded, CIT v. R. F. Nangrani HUF (Bom)(HC) (ITA No. 33 of 2016 dt 18-4 2018)

S. 43B : Deductions on actual payment-Electricity duty-A Licensee-An agency to collect electricity duty from consumers and to pay it to State Government-Disallowance not attracted-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [Art. 136]

PCIT v. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. (2023)454 ITR 801 / 293 Taxman 426 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd(2022) 449 ITR 605 (P&H) (HC), affirmed.

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Provision for warranty-Depreciation on intellectual property. [S. 32, 145(2), 260A]

PCIT v. Landis GYR(2023) 454 ITR 462 (Cal)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Contingent-Ascertained expenditure-Premium payment on redemption of shares which has been quantified-Allowable as revenue expenditure-Duty of Tribunal to give finding based on facts. [S. 254(1)]

Nitesh Housing Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)454 ITR 770 (Karn)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Business loss-Unexplained investments-Search-Unaccounted silver-Penalty or confiscation-Loss on account of confiscation-Not allowable as business loss. [S. 28(i), 37(1), Expln. 69A, 115BBE]

CIT v. Prakash Chand Lunia (Decd. Through Lrs) and Another (2023)454 ITR 61/ 293 Taxman 229 / 332 CTR 261/ 225 DTR 57 (SC) Editorial : Order of Jaipur Bench of Rajasthan High court, reversed, IT v. Prakash Chand Lunia (Decd. Through Lrs) And Another (Raj(HC) (ITA No. 96 of 2003 & ITR NO. 6 OF 1996 DT. 22-11-2016)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Lease of assets-Lease rent assessed as business income in the assessment of lessor-lease rent should be allowed as deduction-Revenue cannot contend that the assessee is the owner. [S. 32, Art. 132]

CIT v. Narmada Chematur Petrochemicals Ltd. (2023)454 ITR 584 / 292 Taxman 2 (SC) Editorial : CIT v. Narmada Chematur Petrochemicals Ltd (Guj)(HC)(ITA No. 1037 of 2013 dt. 28-1-2014)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Final difference in rate paid at end of accounting year-Allowable as deduction. [S. 145]

CIT (Central) v. Kolhapur Zilla Sahkari Dudh Utpadak Sangh Ltd. (2023)454 ITR 434/ 293 Taxman 603 /334 CTR 218 (SC) Editorial: Affirmed, CIT (Central) v. Kolhapur Zilla Sahkari Dudh Utpadak Sangh Ltd (2009) 315 ITR 304 (Bom)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Expenditure on replacement of remembraning in membrane cell plant-No material to show membrane itself could be treated as separate and independent machine-Revenue expenditure.

CIT v. Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd. (2023)454 ITR 808 (SC) Editorial: CIT v. Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd (2015) 372 ITR 237 (Guj)(HC), affirmed. CIT v. Indian Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd (2017) 10 ITR-OL 275 (Guj)(HC), affirmed.

S. 36(1)(vii) :Bad debt-Amounts written off-Agreements with sister concern for take over and assignment of certain book debts-Order of tribunal allowing the bad debt is affirmed.[S. 36(2), 260A]

CIT v. Elgi Equipments Ltd. (2023)454 ITR 11 (Mad)(HC) Editorial: SLP of revenue dismissed, CIT v. Elgi Equipments Ltd. (2023)454 ITR 14 (SC)

S. 36(1)(vii) : Bad debt-Money lending business-Debts taken over from sister concern-Allowed as deduction-SLP of Revenue dismissed. [S. 36(2), Art, 136]

CIT v. Elgi Equipments Ltd. (2023)454 ITR 14/ 293 Taxman 504 (SC) Editorial: CIT v. Elgi Equipments Ltd. (2023)454 ITR 11 / 151 taxmann.com 427 (Mad)(HC), affirmed.