S. 2(15) : Charitable purpose-Advancement of object of general public utility-Changes in law after 1-4-2009-Cannot engage in any trade, commerce or business, or provide service in relation thereto for consideration-Activities must be connected to achievement of object of general public utility and receipts therefrom do not exceed quantified limit-Consideration on cost-basis or nominally above cost not Commercial-Charges significantly above cost would fall within mischief of Trade, commerce or business-Assessing Officer has to decide year to year basis-Separate books of account must be maintained-Statutory corporation, Board or any other body set up by State or Central Government for achieving public functions or services-Receipts not business or commercial receipts-Assessing authorities to determine if consideration significantly higher than cost and if so, whether comply with quantified limit-Central Government to decide on case-by-case basis whether and to what extent exemption can be awarded to notified bodies-Denial of benefit after 1-4-2011 does not preclude from claiming exemption under other provisions-Regulatory bodies tasked with exclusive duties of prescribing curriculum, disciplining professionals and prescribing standards of professional conduct-Prima facie not business or commercial receipts-Bodies involved in trade promotion or purely for co-ordinating and assisting trading organisations-Subjected to rigours of proviso-GSI India Services for benefit of trade and business, from which it received significantly high receipts-Exemption denied-State Cricket Associations-Commercial rights-Each case and for every year tax Authorities to examine pattern of receipts and expenditure-Matter remanded-Private Trust for publishing newspaper-Income received from advertisements constitutes business or commercial receipts Not entitled to exemption-Assessee formed with object of running arogya kendra-No Clarity whether supplying Mid-Day meals fell within objects clause of Society-Tax effect less than Rs. 10 Lakhs-Receipts not exceeding quantitative limit-Entitled to registration-Interpretation of taxing statutes-Amending provisions-to be considered in light of history of legislation and what lawmakers intended by amendment-.Aids to construction-Speeches made in legislature can be looked into-Circulars-Binding upon Departmental Authorities if they advance proposition within framework of statute-Not binding where contrary to statute-Not binding on courts. [S. 10(20A), 10(23C), 10(46), 11, 11(4), 11(4A), 12, 12A, 12AA, 13(8), 143(3)]
ACIT(E) v. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority (2022) 449 ITR 1 / 329 CTR 297 / 219 DTR 209/ 143 taxmann.com 278 //(2023) 291 Taxman 11 (SC) Editorial : For further clarification refer, ACIT(E) v. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority (2022)449 ITR 389 // (2023) 290 Taxman 137 (SC)