This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Material facts-Disclose fully and truly-Deemed cases-Details of accounting-Sufficiency of reasons need not be gone into in writ proceedings-Reassessment notice was held to be valid. [S. 147, Explanation, 2, 148, Art. 226].

SL Lumax Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2021) 437 ITR 549 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Change of opinion-No allegation of non-disclosure of true and full facts-Proviso 1 and 3-Reassessment notice was held to be not valid. [S. 148, Art. 226]

DRS Industries Pvt. Ltd. v Dy.CIT (NO. 2) (2021) 437 ITR 687 / 205 DTR 57/ 322 CTR 289 (Mad.) (HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Real estate business-Sale between related parties-No enquiry was made in the course of original assessment proceedings-New information based on Tribunal judgement-No true disclosure of material facts-Reassessment notice was held to be valid. [S. 40A(2)(b), 148, Art. 226]

Doshi Housing v. PCIT (2021) 437 ITR 317 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts-The four-year period not from the disposal of appeal by CIT (A)-Third proviso-Reassessment is held to be not valid-Reassessment was held to be not valid-Appeal-Consistence view taken in favour of assessee-Appeal is not maintainable. [S. 148, 260A]

PCIT v. Superior Films Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 437 ITR 230/ / 208 DTR 202/ 323 CTR 1016/ 282 Taxman 123 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Incorrect and misleading particulars-Reassessment notice is justified-Writ is not maintainable. [S. 43B(c), 148, Art. 226]

Cairn India Ltd. v. Dy. DIT (IT) (2021) 437 ITR 371 /( 2022) 284 Taman 86 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Incorrect and misleading particulars-Reassessment notice is justified-Writ is not maintainable. [S. 43B(c), 148, Art. 226]

Cairn India Ltd. v. Dy. DIT(IT) (2021) 437 ITR 371 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Survey-Search-Failure to disclose material facts-Information from Investigation wings-Bogus accommodation entries-Reassessment notice was held to be justified. [S. 132, 133(6), 147, Art. 226]

Backbone Projects Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 437 ITR 144 / 206 DTR 169 / 323 CTR 552(Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Amalgamation-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice was held to be not valid. [S. 2(IB), 148, Art. 226]

Roca Bathroom Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2021) 438 ITR 249 / (2022)213 DTR 238/ 329 CTR 464(Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Set-Off of short-term capital gains against business income-No failure to disclose material facts-Disclosure was mentioned in the assessment order-Reassessment notice was quashed. [S. 10A, 10AA, 143(3), 148, Art. 226]

First Source Solutions Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 438 ITR 139 / 206 DTR 441 / 323 CTR 18(Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Tangible material-Accommodation entries-Bogus companies-Information from investigation wing-Reassessment notice is valid. [S. 143(3), 148, Art. 226]

Bharatkumar Kalubhai Ghadiya v. CIT (2021) 438 ITR 443 / 283 Taxman 254 / (2022) 324 CTR 388 209 DTR 291 (Guj.)(HC)