This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Charitable purpose-Provision of credit guarantee for loans to micro and small enterprises-Entitle to exemption-Provision for guarantee claim-Allowable as deduction [S. 37(1)]
Credit Guarantee Fund Trust for Micro and Small Enterprises v. Dy. CIT (E) (2025) 210 ITD 429 (Mum.) (Trib.)
S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Late filing of return-CBDT Circular clarifies that trusts are eligible for exemption u/s.11 even if the return is filed belatedly, provided it is filed within the time permitted u/s.139 (4A) [S. 139(4A)]
K M Educational & Rural-Development Trust v. ITO [2025] 210 ITD 574 (Chen)(Trib.)
S. 10(38) : Long-term capital gains from equities-Penny stock-Accommodation entries-Failure of the Revenue to bring on record any materials linking assessee in any of the dubious transactions-Addition as cash credit is deleted.[S. 45, 68, 147, 148]
Archit Gupta v. ACIT (2025) 210 ITD 27 (Delhi) (Trib.)
S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-US based company-amount received by assessee from Indian customers on account of sale of software solutions-not royalty income-DTAA-India-USA [Art. 12]
Dassault Systems SolidWorks Corporations v. ACIT (IT) (2025) 210 ITD 476 (Mum.) (Trib.)
S. 9(1)(vii):Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Fees for technical services-Sales commission received by USA Company from Indian company-marketing services provided outside India-Cannot be considered as FTS under 9(1)(vii) and Article 12 of DTAA-Not taxable in India-DTAA-India-USA [Art. 12]
Manthan System Inc v. DCIT (IT). [2025] 121 ITR 198/172 taxmann.com 8 (Bang)(Trib)
S. 9(1)(i): Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Assessee, US based company, had closed its Liaison Office (LO) operations in India and no business activity was carried out through the LO-Held, since assessee had no PE in India-Question of attribution of profits to PE in India did not arise-therefore, amounts paid by resident Indian end-users/distributions to the Assessee as consideration for resale/use of computer software through EULAs/distribution agreements, is not payment of royalty for use of copyright in computer software-DTAA-India-USA [Art.5]
Bently Nevada LLC v. ACIT, IT (2025) 210 ITD 191 (Delhi) (Trib.)
S. 9(1)(i): Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-AO considered assessee as supervisory PE-estimated profit of 10% as profit rate on income earned and 25% as attributable towards PE-Held profits were taxable in India-ad-hoc percentage cannot be applied-matter set-aside to the Assessing Officer.
J.M. Voith SE & Co. KG v. DCIT (IT) 2024) 161 taxmann.com 734 / [2025] 121 ITR 402 (Delhi)(Trib)
S. 4: Charge of income-tax-receipt of certain amount from Government-credited to Income and Expenditure Statement under head ‘grant-in-aid’ for establishment expenses-issue of specific Accounting Standard was not dealt with by the AO, matter was to be remanded back to inter alia verify receipt of income and method of accounting adopted for the same-Form No 10-Condonation of delay-If CBDT condone dely in filing Form No 10, the assessee would get consequential benefits under section 11(2) read with section 139(9) of the Act.[S. 11,(2), 139(9), 145]
ACIT (E) v. Chanakya National Law University (2025) 210 ITD 333 (Patna) (Trib.)
S. 2(42A) : Short-term capital asset-Capital gains-land received consequent to liquidation of company-Period of holding of land-from date of previous owner i.e., company-Assessable as long term capital gains-The land received as a result of liquidation of company-Does not amount to transfer of any capital asset within meaning of S. 50C of the Act.[S. 45,46(2), 50C, 54F]
ACIT v. Venkatesh Meghraj Kathare (2025) 210 ITD 140 (Chennai) (Trib.)
Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 (2024) 467 ITR 1 (St)(63)
S. 89:Definitions-Appellant-Benefit of Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 extended to those assesses in whose case the time for filing appeal has not expired as on 22 July 2024.[S.89(1)(a)) DTVSV Act, 2020, S. 2(1)(a), Art. 226]
Srinivasan Jayaprakasam v. CBDT (2025) 171 taxmann.com 101 /473 ITR 245 (Mad)(HC)