This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-Income from sale of software license-Not assessable as royalty-DTAA-DTAA-India-USA. [Art. 5, 7, 12]

Ansys Inc. v. ACIT (IT) (2021) 189 ITD 671 (Pune)(Trib.)

S. 9(1)(i) : Income-Deemed to accrue or arise in India-Shipping, Inland waterways transport-Wholly managed or controlled from the UAE-satisfied requirement of article 4-Entitled to treaty benefit-DTAA-India-UAE. [S. 90, 144C, Art. 4(1)(b), 8(1), 29]

Interworld Shipping Agency LLC. v. DCIT (IT) (2021) 189 ITD 213 / 201 DTR 161 / 211 TTJ 385 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 148: Reassessment – Notice-Constitutional validity – The delegation authorized being only for the purpose of enlarging limitation under a valid law, such delegation could not be exercised to resurrect the provision of law that stood omitted from the statute book by virtue of its substitution made by the Finance Act, 2021, w.e.f. 01.04.2021 – Reassessment notices issued under section 148 of the Act are quashed-It is left open to the assessing authority to initiate – re-assessment proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Act, as amended by the Finance Act, 2021 after making due compliance as required under the law. [S. 147, 148A, 149, 151, 151A, 153, 292 Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 (TOLA), S. 3(1) of the Act 38 of 2020, Art. 226]

Mon Mohan Kohli v. ACIT (2021] 133 taxmann.com 166 ( Delhi ) (HC)www.itatonline.org

GST .

Lawyers in individual capacity – Legal consultancy services – Service tax and GST – Notice issued to lawyers to prove that they are individual lawyers – Notice was quashed – Directed the GST Commissioner to instruct its subordinate offices not to issue such notices ( [ Art, 226 ]

Devy Prasad Tripathy 2021 (47) G.S.T.L. 462 ( Orissa) ( HC)

S. 292B : Notice not to be invalid on certain grounds – Notice issued in the name of a dead person is a nullity. [ S.153C ]

Bhupendra Bhikhalal Desai v. ITO (2021) 320 CTR 289/ 200 DTR 313/130 taxmann.com 196 (Guj)(HC).Editorial : SLP of revenue dismissed , ITO v. Bhupendra Bhikhalal Desai (2021) 283 Taxman 189 / 283 Taxman 376 (SC)

S. 245C : Settlement Commission – Settlement of cases – Conditions – Subsequent additional statements could not be relied upon in order to satisfy requirements of S/245C and ITSC has exceeded its jurisdiction in setting aside such issue as regular assessment has to be made in such case. [ Art . 226 ]

CIT v. ITSC (2021) 127 taxmann.com 367 (Mad) (HC)

S. 90: Double taxation relief – Assessee – Company being a tax resident of Singapore is eligible to the benefits of India-Singapore tax treaty with respect to sale of shares in Indian subsidiary – LOB clause is not applicable as such sale was pursuant to genuine business restructuring and MNC’s activity of being an investment holding company is a bonafide business activity – Hence, no capital gains on sale of shares of Indian subsidiary by a Singapore holding investment company.

BG Asia Pacific Holding Pte Ltd In re (2021) 125 taxmann.com 2 ( AAR )

S. 80IA : Industrial undertakings – Infrastructure development – Scope of S/80IA(5) is limited to determine quantum of deduction under S/80IA(1) by treating ‘eligible business’ as ‘only source of income’ – However, S/80IA(5) cannot be read to limit the deduction only to business income. [ S80AB ]

CIT v. Reliance Energy Ltd (2021) 127 taxmann.com 69 / 320 CTR 473 / 201 CTR 73 (SC)CIT v. Reliance Energy Ltd (2021) 127 taxmann.com 69 / 320 CTR 473 / 201 CTR 73 (SC)

S. 45 : Capital gains – Transfer – Power of attorney -Since all rights in the property, including constructive possession was handed over by the Assessee to purchaser the transaction has rightly been treated as sale or transfer u/s 2(47) of the Act by lower authorities, giving rise to capital gains. [ S. 2(47 )(v), 2 (47) (vi ) ]

CIT v. Abdul Wahabs (2021) 320 CTR 874/ 201 DTR 118 (Karn)(HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment – Notice – Constitutional validity – The delegation authorized being only for the purpose of enlarging limitation under a valid law, such delegation could not be exercised to resurrect the provision of law that stood omitted from the statute book by virtue of its substitution made by the Finance Act, 2021, w.e.f. 01.04.2021-Reassessment notices issued under section 148 of the Act are quashed – It is left open to the assessing authority to initiate -re -assessment proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Act, as amended by the Finance Act , 2021 after making due compliance as required under the law . [ S. 147, 148A, 149, 151 , 151A , 153,292 Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 , S.3(1) of the Act 38 of 2020, Art , 226 ]

BPIP Infra Pvt Ltd and Ors v. ITO ( 2021 ) 208 DTR 145/ 323 CTR 879 / ( 2022) 440 ITR 300/ 284 Taxman 635 ( Raj ) (HC) www.itatonlline .org/Kandai Metal Powders Manufacturing Company (P) Ltd v.ACIT ( 2022) 285 Taxman 500( Raj) (HC)