This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 43B : Deductions on actual payment-Employees’ contribution of PF and ESI before due date of filing return-Entitled to deduction. [S. 36(1)(va), 139(1)]

Environs Management (Bangalore) (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2022) 194 ITD 67 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 43(5) : Speculative transaction-Trading in derivatives-Hedging contract with its bankers to minimize possible fluctuation in foreign currency-Not speculation loss-Allowable as business or business expenditure. [S. 28(i), 37(1)]

DCIT v. Kunnam Granite Works (2022) 194 ITD 238 (Chennai) (Trib.)

S. 40A(3) : Expenses or payments not deductible-Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits-Payment was made by way of legal tender i.e. Indian currency, said payments were covered by exception contemplated in rule 6DD(b)-Disallowance is not valid [R.6DD(b)] and, therefore, same could not be disallowed under section 40A(3).

DCIT v. Vinod Arora (2022) 194 ITD 605 (Amritsar)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ii) : Amounts not deductible-Rates or tax-Education cess cannot be equated as tax or surcharge-Allowable as business.

Security Printing & Minting Corporation of India Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 194 ITD 641 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Contractors/sub-contractors Custom House agent, to shipping companies/CFS agents-Failure to deduct tax at source-Disallowance is valid. [S. 194C]

Shri Shanmugar Services v. ITO (2022) 194 ITD 747 (Chennai) (Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Tax deducted by applying wrong provision of the Act-Lower rate-No disallowance can be made. [S. 201(1), 201(IA)]

M.V.A. Seetharama Raju v. DCIT (2022) 194 ITD 359 / 97 ITR 714 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Interest on Bank loans-Interest paid on bank loans is not liable to TDS deduction and hence disallowance is not called for-Matter remanded for verification. [S. 37(1)]

TUV Rheinland NIFE Academy (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 194 ITD 78 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Royalty-Payments to foreign company for rendering internet private line services-Ambiguity in definition of royalty-Disallowance is not valid-DTAA-India-USA. [S. 9(1)(vi), 9(1))(vii), 195, Art. 12]

Ceequence Technologies (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2022) 194 ITD 693 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Repair and maintenance services-Reimbursement of expenses-No TDS is deductible-DTAA-India-Japan. [S. 9(1)(vii), 19, Art. 12]

PPN Power Generating Co. (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 194 ITD 623 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Shipping business-As per charging section 172, no liability arises for payment of tax by non-resident receiving payment on time charter basis. [S. 172, 195]

ITO v. Terapanth Foods Ltd. (2022) 194 ITD 614 (Rajkot) (Trib.)