S. 271D : Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Cash payment to wife-Sale consideration-Levy of penalty is not justified [S. 269SS, 271E]
Sudhir Kumar Rawat v. ITO (2022) 219 TTJ 1004 / 218 DTR 337 (Jab)(Trib)S. 271D : Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Cash payment to wife-Sale consideration-Levy of penalty is not justified [S. 269SS, 271E]
Sudhir Kumar Rawat v. ITO (2022) 219 TTJ 1004 / 218 DTR 337 (Jab)(Trib)S. 271D : Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Limitation–Action for imposition of penalty initiated by notice-Time for passing of penalty order to be reckoned from that date of initiation-Order is barred by limitation. [S. 271E, 275(1)(c)]
Triumph Securities Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2022)99 ITR 58 (SN)(Mum) (Trib)S. 271D : Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Non-Resident-50 Per Cent of interest in property-Sale consideration disclosed in the sale deed-No intention to evade the tax-Reasonable cause-Penalty cancelled. [S. 269SS, 273]
Anuradha Chivukula Challa (Smt.) v. Addl. CIT (IT) (2022)99 ITR 1 (SN)(Bang)(Trib)S. 271D : Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Annulment of assessment-Cancellation of penalty is not valid. [S. 143(3),271E]
Dy. CIT v. C. Gangadhara Murthy v. PCIT (2022) 218 TTJ 19(UO) (Pune)(Trib)S. 271D : Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Limitation-Two specific periods of limitation-End of financial year in which assessment proceedings completed, or six months from end of month in action for imposition of penalty initiated, whichever is later-Penalty order is barred by limitation. [S. 269SS, 273B, 275 (1)(c)]
Sameer Noorullah Khan v. CIT (Appeals) (2022) 98 ITR 42 (SN)(Mum) (Trib)S. 271C : Penalty-Failure to deduct at source-Purchase of immovable property-Reasonable cause-Not aware of the provision-Penalty was deleted.[S.194IA, 273B]
Manish Jaiswal v. ACIT (2022) 216 DTR 36 / 218 TTJ 737 (Varanasi)(Trib)S. 271C : Penalty-Failure to deduct at source-Deduction and deposit of tax in subsequent year after receipt of invoices-No Tax evasion or loss of revenue-Penalty not leviable [S.40(a)(ia), 273B, 274]
ACIT v. Parsons Brinckershoff India Pvt. Ltd. (2022)95 ITR 71 (Delhi)(Trib)S. 271C : Penalty-Failure to deduct at source-External development charges paid to the Haryana Urban Development Authority-Levy of penalty was deleted.
Signature Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2022) 99 ITR 211 (Delhi) (Trib)S. 271B :Penalty-Failure to get accounts audited-Limitation-Notice issued two and half years after assessment order passed-Barred by limitation. [S. 44AB]
Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit v. ITO (2022) 99 ITR 156 /219 TTJ 17 (UO) (Raippur)(Trib)S. 271B : Penalty-Failure to get accounts audited-No finding in the assessment order-Levy of penalty after 30 months after completion of the assessment-Barred by limitation. [S. 44AB, 275(1)(c)]
Jila Sahakari Kendriya Benk Maryadit v. ITO (2022) 219 TTJ 17 (UO)/ 99 ITR 156 (Raipur)(Trib)