S. 36(1)(vii) :Bad debt-Unit sold as slump sale-Past advances written off relating to sold unit-Not allowable as deduction.
Dy. CIT v. Kanoria Chemicals & Industries Ltd. (2022) 215 TTJ 1003 (Kol)(Trib)S. 36(1)(vii) :Bad debt-Unit sold as slump sale-Past advances written off relating to sold unit-Not allowable as deduction.
Dy. CIT v. Kanoria Chemicals & Industries Ltd. (2022) 215 TTJ 1003 (Kol)(Trib)S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Real estate developer-Interest paid on overdraft-Closing stock and working progress-Disallowance was deleted-Loan to subsidiaries-Recovered the interest paid on overdraft-Deletion of interest is affirmed.
ACIT v. Milroc Good Earth Property & Development LLP (2022) 217 TTJ 52 (UO)/ 142 taxmann.com 149 (Panaji)(Trib)S. 36(1)(iii) :Interest on borrowed capital-Sufficient funds-Investment in shares-Disallowance is not justified-Matter remanded.
ACIT v. Nahar Industrial Enterprises Ltd. (2022) 219 DTR 73 / 219 TTJ 544 / 99 ITR 562 (Chd)(Trib) ACIT v. Nahar Spinning Mills Ltd (2022) 219 DTR 73 / 219 TTJ 544 / 99 ITR 562 / 142 taxmann.com 52 (Chd)(Trib) ACIT v. Oswal Woollen Mills Ltd. (2022) 219 DTR 73/ 219 TTJ 544 / 99 ITR 562 / 142 taxmann.com 52 (Chd)(Trib)S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Amount advanced to sister concern-Interest recovered-Disallowance of interest is not justified.
Milrco Good Earth Property & Development LLP v. ACIT (2022) 217 TTJ 52 (UO) / 142 taxmann.com 149 (Panaji) (Trib)S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Interest-free funds far in excess of loan advanced-Disallowance of interest not warranted.
Wanbury Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 95 ITR 87 (SN)(Mum) (Trib)S. 36(1)(iii): Interest on borrowed capital-Advancing borrowed money to sister concern for business purposes without charging interest-Interest expenses allowable as deduction. [S. 37(1)]
Dy. CIT v. Shriram Investments (2022)95 ITR 111 (Chennai)(Trib)S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Bad Debt-Advance for purchase of material for stock-in-trade-Amount written off-Allowable as deduction. [S. 28 (i)]
K. Patel International v. ACIT (2022) 96 ITR 71 (SN) (Surat) (Trib)S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Loans and Advances to subsidiaries without charging Interest-Failure to prove for Commercial expediency-Disallowance of interest justified. [S. 37(1)]
BGR Energy Systems Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 96 ITR 625 (Chennai) (Trib) ACIT v. Sasikala Raghupathy (Smt) (2022)96 ITR 625 (Chennai) (Trib)S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Real income theory-Interest not accrued to assessee for two preceding year-Accepted by the Department-Disallowance of proportionate notional interest is not justified.[S. 145]
Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2022)97 ITR 516 (Delhi) (Trib)S. 36(1)(iii): Interest on borrowed capital-Interest free funds-Interest free loans to subsidiary-Deletion of addition is justified.
Dy. CIT v. Jagson International Ltd. (2022) 97 ITR 176 (Delhi) (Trib) United Spirits Ltd v. Dy.CIT (2022) 97 ITR 272 (Bang) (Trib)