S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparable-Turnover more than Rs.200 crores-Excluded-Working capital adjustment. [S. 92CA]
GE Be Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022)99 ITR 47 (SN)(Bang)(Trib)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparable-Turnover more than Rs.200 crores-Excluded-Working capital adjustment. [S. 92CA]
GE Be Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022)99 ITR 47 (SN)(Bang)(Trib)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Restricted only to the international transactions-VRS expenses-Similar cost incurred by the comparables if any also be given. [S.37(1), 92CA]
Rieter India (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 215 TTJ 13 (UO) (Pune) Trib)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Providing Crew for Employment on Principal’s Vessels-Agency fee-Expenses incurred reimbursed by associated enterprise-Adjustment was made based on incorrect appreciation of facts-Adjustment was deleted.[S. 144C]
Zodiac Maritime Agencies India Pvt. Ltd. v. NEACE (2022) 98 ITR 48 (SN) (Mum)(Trib)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Most appropriate method-Resale of online advertisement space-Resale Price Method most appropriate method.
Dy. CIT v. Komli Wedia India P. Ltd. (2022) 98 ITR 5(SN)(Mum) (Trib)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Most Appropriate Method-Net Margin Method-Comparable Uncontrolled Price Method-Processing fees-Local guarantees issued based on counter guarantee received from overseas branches-Adjustment was deleted.
Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. v. DY. CIT (IT) (2022) 98 ITR 61 (SN) (Mum.)(Trib.)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Most Appropriate Method-Net Margin Method-Comparable Uncontrolled Price Method-Processing fees-Local guarantees issued based on counter guarantee received from overseas branches-Adjustment was deleted.
Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (IT) (2022) 98 ITR 61 (SN)(Mum) (Trib)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Net Margin Method-Comparable Uncontrolled Price Methods-Bad debts-Written off-Write off does not affect the Arm’s length price. [S. 36(1)(vii)]
Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 98 ITR 54 (SN)(Hyd) (Trib)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Profit split method inappropriate-Assessee made no unique intangible contribution-Transactional net margin method appropriate-TPO to recompute arm’s length price. [S.92CA, 144C]
Toyota Boshoku Automotive India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2022)98 ITR 363 (Bang.)(Trib.)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Working capital adjustment-Information regarding comparable companies not available in public domain-Matter remanded to Assessing Officer/Transfer Pricing Officer to decide issue afresh after affording opportunity of being heard. [S. 92CA]
Aurigo Software Technologies P. Ltd. v. ITO (2022) 98 ITR 294 (Bang.)(Trib.)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Capital Utilization-Functioning at lower capacity than average-Adjustment for underutilization required-Import of raw material-Loss due to foreign exchange rates fluctuation-Foreign exchange rates fluctuation adjustment to be considered-Matter remanded to TPO. [S.92CA]
Denso Kirloskar Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 98 ITR 399 (Bang) (Trib)