This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 10(34) :Dividend – Domestic companies – Tax on distribution of profits – Dividend received during FY. 2019 -20 relevant to AY. 2020- 21 cannot be taxed . [S. 115O, 154 ]

Manmohan Textiles Ltd v. NFAC ( 2023) BCAJ -January – P. 32( Mum)( Trib)

S. 226 : Collection and recovery – Modes of recovery – 20% of tax demand – Liability of directors of the private limited company – Pendency of appeal – Assessing Officer cannot directly initiate recovery proceedings against directors of the company without taking an assertive step for recovery of the outstanding tax due from the Private Limited company [ S. 179, Art , 226 ]

Devendra Babulal Jain v. ITO ( 2023) The Chamber’s Journal -January -P. 89 ( Guj)( HC)

S. 201 : Deduction at source – Failure to deduct or pay – Stay of recovery – Pendency of appeal – Tax Authorities can grant stay against recovery of demand on deposit of a lesser than 20 percent of the disputed demand . [S. 220 (6), Art , 226 ]

Dr. B.L.Kapur Memorial Hospital v .CIT ( 2023 ) BCAJ- January P. 46 ( Delhi)( HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment – Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice – Participated in the proceedings by filing return and responding to the notice – Writ is not maintainable [s. 147, 148, 148A(b), Art , 226 ]

Auroglobal Comtrade (P.) Ltd v. CBDT (2022) 143 taxmann.com 120/ (2023) 290 Taxman 84/ 221 DTR 433/ 330 CTR 628 ( Orissa )( HC)

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment – Violation of principle of natural justice – Show cause notice – Only two day’s time to file response – Violation of Circular dated 3-8 -2022 – Minimum period of seven days should be provided – Order was set aside [ S. 144(6)(vii),Art, 226 ]

CS& Sons v. NFAC(2023) BCAJ – February – P. 48 ( Bom)( HC)

S.37(1): Business expenditure – Marked -to -Market loss – Loss arising on reinstatement of the forward cover purchase contracts – Not speculative -CBDT Instructions and circulars which are contrary to law are not binding – Allowable as revenue expenditure . [ S. 43(5), 73 ]

PCIT v. Simon India Ltd ( 2022 ) 145 taxmann.com 389/ (2023) 450 ITR 316 ( Delhi)( HC)

.37(1): Business expenditure – Corporate Social Responsibility( CSR)- Explanation 2 was inserted in section 37 by Finance (No.2) Act , 2004 , w.e.f. Ist April , 2015 – Apply in relation to the assessment year 2015 -16 and subsequent years – Expenditure allowable as deduction .

PCIT v. PEC Ltd ( 2023 ) BCAJ – January P. 44( Delhi)( HC)

S. 279 : Offences and prosecutions-Sanction-Chief Commissioner-Commissioner-Compounding of offence-Past conviction for default in depositing of TDS were not disclosed-Order of conviction was under challenge before Supreme Court and stayed-Order of rejection was held to be valid-Untill pending conviction orders with respect to earlier years were set aside. [S. 276B, 278B, Art. 226]

Viraj Exports (P.) Ltd. v. CCIT (TDS) (2022) 289 Taxman 430/ (2023) 457 ITR 451/ 333 CTR 395/ 227 DTR 111 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 276CC : Offences and prosecutions-Failure to furnish return of income-Search-Delay of 72 days in filing of return-Failure to provide copies of statements-No evasion of tax-Lunching of prosecution was quashed. [S. 132, 153A, 279]

Ashish Agarwal v. ITD (2022) 289 Taxman 518 (Raj.)(HC)

S. 276CC : Offences and prosecutions-Failure to furnish return of income-Return was filed within extended time-Refund was granted-Criminal miscellaneous was quashed. [S. 139(1), 139(4)]

Arvind Nandagopal v. ACIT (2022) 289 Taxman 679 (Mad)(HC)