S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Redeemable gift vouchers-No evidence doubting genuineness of the expenditure-Disallowance is not justified.
ACIT v. Rohit and Co. (2022)97 ITR 223 (Kol)(Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Redeemable gift vouchers-No evidence doubting genuineness of the expenditure-Disallowance is not justified.
ACIT v. Rohit and Co. (2022)97 ITR 223 (Kol)(Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Aircraft Lease Rental-Lessor eligible to claim depreciation-Lessee eligible to claim deduction on rental payments of the aircrafts-Accounting standard created distinction between finance lease and operating lease-Not applicable-Allowed in earlier years-Principle of consistency followed.[S. 32, 145]
Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2022) 97 ITR 516 (Delhi) (Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Construction of hospital and school auditorium for benefits of employees-expense made wholly for the purpose of business-Allowable as deduction
Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2022)97 ITR 516 (Delhi) (Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Employee’s stock option plan-Option to purchase shares after completion of vesting period at a lesser price than the market value-Ascertainable liability-Allowable as deduction [S. 145]
Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2022)97 ITR 516 (Delhi) (Trib)S.37(1): Business expenditure-Additional levy of coal pursuant to Supreme court direction-Allowable as deduction. [S. 145]
Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2022)97 ITR 516 (Delhi) (Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Travelling expenses-Ad-hoc disallowance is not justified.
Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2022)97 ITR 516 (Delhi) (Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Mercantile system of accounting-leas rent paid pertaining to earlier year-Crystallised during financial year-Allowable as deduction.[S. 145]
Kamla Retail Ltd. v. Addl. CIT(2022) 212 DTR 94 / 216 TTJ 483 / 140 taxmann.com 343 (Chd)(Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Foreign Travel expense-Expenses or payments not deductible-Excessive or unreasonable-Motor Car Expenditure to director-Restriction of disallowance to 10% is held to be justified.[S. 40A(2)]
Dy. CIT v. S. Kumars Nationwide Ltd. (2022) 97 ITR 60 (SN) (Mum) (Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Payment for subscription services of software-No acquisition of software-Telephone and internet expenses-Allowable as revenue expenditure.
Bigfoot Retail Solution Pvt. Ltd v. ACIT (2022)97 ITR 73 (SN)(Delhi)(Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or Revenue-Non-compete fee-Amortised-Depreciation claimed-Capital expenditure. [S. 32]
Adler Mediequip Pvt. Ltd v. Dy.CIT (2022)97 ITR 20 (SN) (Pune) (Trib)