This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Principle of natural justice-Show cause notice-Request for extension of time-Order passed before considering the reply-Order was set a side. [S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(c), 148A(d), Art. 226]
Meenu Chaufla v. ITO (2022) 445 ITR 1 /287 Taxman 317 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Non-consideration of assessee’s response to show-cause notice-Order quashed-Matter remanded. [S. 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]
Jasmine Bonny Agitok Sangma v. UOI (2022) 445 ITR 4/ 217 DTR 177 / 328 CTR 560 (Meghalaya)(HC)
S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Failure to consider replies submitted-Notice and order set aside-Matter remanded. [S. 147, 148, 148A(d), Art. 226]
Fena Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 445 ITR 434 / 214 DTR 145/ 326 CTR 874 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Natural justice-Order passed without considering request for sufficient time-Order set aside. [S. 147, 148A(b) 148A(d), 151, Art. 226]
Divya Capital One Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 445 ITR 436/ 214 DTR 1 / 326 CTR 781 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Natural justice-Order passed without considering request for sufficient time-Order set aside. [S. 147, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]
Divij Singh Kadan v. PCIT (2022) 445 ITR 445/ 214 DTR 417/ 327 CTR 193 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-Alternative remedy-Writ against reassessment order was dismissed. [S. 148, Art. 226]
Thota Venkateswara Rao v. NFAC (2022) 445 ITR 460 (AP)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-Show cause notice-Alternative remedy-Time granted to file reply only two days-Directed to provide time of 10 days to file the reply-Appeal Lies from order of reassessment-Writ is not maintainable. [S. 148, 246A, Art. 226]
Sharda Lunkar v. UOI (2022) 445 ITR 285/ 219 DTR 147/ 329 CTR 281 (Gauhati)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-Date of issue and service of notice-Digital signature of Authority dated March 31, 2021-Notices Issued through Electronic mode on March 31, 2021 prior to amendment in law from April 1, 2021 and deemed to be served. [S. 148,149, 282, 282A, TOLA Act, 2020, S. 3(1), IT Rules 1962, R 127A(1), Art. 226]
Malavika Enterprises v. CBDT (2022) 445 ITR 651 / 287 Taxman 693 / 218 DTR 153 / 328 CTR 853 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Change of opinion-Payment to related parties-Failure to deduct tax at source-Allowed claim without speaking order-Re assessment notice-Not valid. [S. 40A(2)(b), 148, 194C, Evidence Act, 1872 S. 114(e), Art. 226]
LSI India Research and Development P. Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2022) 445 ITR 183 / 214 DTR 330/ 329 CTR 637(Karn.)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-Writ-Territorial jurisdiction of High Court-Cause of action-Permanent Account Number Card having Cuttack address-Residential address in Ahmedabad-Amendment of Article 226 in 1976-The validity of the reassessment notice would not be considered by the Gujarat High Court. [S. 148, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, 20(6), Art. 226(2)]
Bhavendra Hasmukhlal Patadia v. UOI (2022) 445 ITR 410/ 214 DTR 209/ 326 CTR 809 (Guj.)(HC)