This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals 
  Click here
 Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws 
 
	
		        
		
			
								
					
					
					
					
																	
						
						
S. 28(iv) : Business income-Value of any benefit or perquisites-Company-Principle of  lifting of  corporate veil-Converted in to money or not-Directors transferring shares to persons in control of company which had discontinued news paper business-Not a case of acquisition of shares simpliciter-Benefit derived by transaction to be taxed  as arising from business from adventure in nature of  trade-Not as income from other sources-Valuation of  benefit at fair market value of  property proper.  [S. 2(13) 28(i), 56, 56(2)viib), R. 11UA]   
	
						 
								
				Young Indian v. ACIT (E) (2022) 95 ITR 33 (SN) / 218 TTJ 1 (Delhi)(Trib)
				
					 
											 
					
					
		
			
									 
				
			
								
					
					
					
					
																	
						
						
S. 28(1) : Business income-Capital or  revenue-Benefit or  perquisite arising from business-Engine manufacturer giving assessee credit for selecting its engines-Not assessable as revenue receipt or capital gains-Capital receipts-Construction of documents-Nature of  receipt to be judged in hands of  recipient-Entries in books of  account not determinative of  character of  receipt as income. [S.4, 28(iv), 45, 48] 
	
						 
								
				Interglobe Aviation Ltd. (Indigo) v. Add. CIT (2022)95 ITR 586 (SB) (Delhi)(Trib.)
				
					 
											 
					
					
		
			
									 
				
			
								
					
					
					
					
																	
						
						
S. 28(i) : Business loss-Advances given to employees for meeting expenses-Amounts irrecoverable-Allowable as business loss-Matter remanded to the  Assessing Officer for fresh examination. [S. 37(1)]  
	
						 
								
				Xchanging Solutions Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022)96 ITR 544 (Bang)(Trib)
				
					 
											 
					
					
		
			
									 
				
			
								
					
					
					
					
																	
						
						
S. 28(i): Business loss-Embezzled-Loss deemed to be arisen when assessee comes to know about it and on realization on non recovery despite multiple attempts-Police complaints, Banking ombudsman etc-Write off on loss due to embezzlement allowable. [S. 145] 
	
						 
								
				George Oakes Ltd v. ACIT (2022) 97 ITR 44 (SN) (Chennai)(Trib)
				
					 
											 
					
					
		
			
									 
				
			
								
					
					
					
					
																	
						
						
S. 28(i) : Business loss-Working capital-Allowable as business loss. [S. 37(1)] 
	
						 
								
				Dy. CIT v. Global Wool Alliance Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 100 ITR 12 (SN) (Kol)(Trib)
				
					 
											 
					
					
		
			
									 
				
			
								
					
					
					
					
																	
						
						
S. 28(i) : Business loss-Fluctuation in foreign exchange-Restatement of  outstanding liabilities on revenue items-Allowable as revenue expenditure. [S. 37(1)] 
	
						 
								
				Herbalife International India Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 100 ITR 456 (Bang.) (Trib)
				
					 
											 
					
					
		
			
									 
				
			
								
					
					
					
					
																	
						
						
S. 28(i) : Business loss-Real estate business-Purchase of land-Litigation-Stock in  trade-Allowable as business loss.
	
						 
								
				Amarnath Aggarwal Builders Pvt. Ltd v. Dy. CIT (2022) 99 ITR 194 (Amritsar) (Trib)
				
					 
											 
					
					
		
			
									 
				
			
								
					
					
					
					
																	
						
						
S. 28(i) : Business loss-Business expenditure-Commodities trading-Non-recovery of purchase cost of goods paid to National Spot Exchange (NSEL)-Allowable as business loss [S. 37(1), 145]
	
						 
								
				Dy. CIT v. Cello Pens & Stationary (P) Ltd. (2022) 215 TTJ 486 / 210 DTR 53 (Mum)(Trib)
				
					 
											 
					
					
		
			
									 
				
			
								
					
					
					
					
																	
						
						
S. 28(i) : Business loss-Forward contract-Hedging transactions through banks-Loss allowable as business loss and not speculation loss. [S. 43(5), 73] 
	
						 
								
				Dy. CIT v. Mahendra Brothers Exports Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 99 ITR 537 (Mum)(Trib)
				
					 
											 
					
					
		
			
									 
				
			
								
					
					
					
					
																	
						
						
S. 28(i): Business loss-Operationalising a sick company-Loss is allowable as business loss. [S. 37(1)] 
	
						 
								
				ITO v. Roj Enterprises (P) Ltd. (2022) 219 TTJ 70 (UO) (Pune)(Trib)