This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 195 : Deduction at source-Non-resident-Income deemed to arise in India-Computer software through EULA/distribution agreement, is not payment of royalty for use of copyright in computer software and, thus, same does not give rise to any income taxable in India-Not liable to deduct tax at source-DTAA-India-USA. [S. 9(1)(vi), Copy Right Act, 1957, S. 14(a), 14(b), 52(1)(aa), Art. 12(4)(b)]

Bain & Company India (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (TDS) (2022) 193 ITD 787 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 195 : Deduction at source-Non-resident-Transponder service fee-Not in nature of royalty in hand of recipient-Not liable to deduct tax at source. [S. 9(1)(vii), 195(2)]

ACIT (IT) v. Viacom18 Media (P.) Ltd. (2022) 193 ITD 716 (Mum.) (Trib.)

S. 154 : Rectification of mistake-Unutilisation of MODVAT-Order of Assessing Officer and Commissioner (Appeals) got merged with order of Tribunal-Rejection of rectification application is justified [S. 254(1)]

Khyati Chemicals (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (OSD) (2022) 193 ITD 446 (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 154 : Rectification of mistake-Interest-Compensation on Agricultural land-Failure to claim statutory deduction-Mistake apparent hence amenable for rectification. [S. 57(iv), 143(1)]

Dhanesh Kumar Jain v. ACIT (2022) 193 ITD 1 / 220 TTJ 113/ 218 DTR 307 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 145 : Method of accounting-Real estate business-Percentage completion method-Not justified in rejecting the method of accounting followed by the Assessee.

Peninsula Land Ltd. v. DCIT (2022) 193 ITD 366 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Draft assessment order with demand notice-Initiating penalty proceeding-Draft assessment order being contrary to provisions of section 144C could not survive in eyes of law. [S. 156, 271(1)(c)]

Cisco Systems Services B.V. v. DCIT(IT) (2022) 193 ITD 809/220 TTJ 378/ 219 DTR 249 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Provision for gratuity-Disallowed in the return-Addition is held to be not valid. [S. 37(1)]

Shakti Apifoods (P.) Ltd. v. Assessing Officer (2022) 193 ITD 751 (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Protective assessment-Excess cash recovered from registered office of assessee-No substantive addition was made in hands of any other person-Addition u/s 69A would not survive. [S. 69A, 132]

Pegasus Properties (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT, (2022) 193 ITD 514 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Charge of income-tax-Order passed by National Company Law Tribunal under section 31 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 has overriding effect over anything inconsistent contained in Income-tax Act and it shall be binding on all respective entities including other stakeholders, which include Central Government, State Government and other local bodies-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer. [S. 4, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, S 31, 238]

Palogix Infrastructure (P.) Ltd. v. (2022) 193 ITD 329 (Kol.) (Trib.)

S. 140A : Self assessment-Failure to deposit admitted self-assessment tax-Financial difficulty-Levy of penalty is not valid. [S. 140A(3), 221(1)]

DCIT v. Karanja Terminal & Logistic (P.) Ltd. (2022) 193 ITD 385 / 215 TTJ 41/ 215 DTR 289 (Mum.)(Trib.)