This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Natural justice-Draft Assessment order-Video Conferencing.-Request for personal hearing was not granted-Order was quashed and set aside-Directed to pass the order after granting personal hearing. [Art. 226]
Rhenus Logistics India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (Bom.)(HC)(UR)
S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Natural Justice-Personal hearing not given-Order was quashed and set aside-Directed to grant personal hearing. [Art. 226]
Delta Global Allied Ltd. v. ACIT (Bom.)(HC)(UR)
S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Natural justice-Personal hearing was not granted-Show cause-cum-draft Assessment order-Order was set aside. [Art. 226]
RBL Bank Limited v. ACIT (Bom.)(HC)(UR)
S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Natural justice-Sufficient time was not given to petitioner to respond assessment order-Matter is remand to the stage when the draft assessment order was issued. [S. 147, 148, Art. 226]
B.K. Associates v. NEAC (Bom.)(HC)(UR)
S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Tribunal decided the issue in favour of assessee in earlier years-Order of Tribunal binding on the Assessing Officer though the matter is pending for admission before High Court-Re assessment notice based on the order of earlier years is bad in law-Assessing Officer cannot rely on assessment orders which are non existing because these orders have been held unjustified by the ITAT. [S. 143(1), 148, Art. 226]
J.K .Trust v. ACIT (Bom)(HC) (UR )
S. 270A : Penalty for under-Reporting and misreporting of income-Pendency of appeal before Commissioner (Appeals)-Oder imposing the penalty was not valid-The concerned Assessing Officer may take further steps in accordance with law after the appeal is disposed by CIT (A) as far as it relates to penalty provisions under Section 270A of the Act-Faceless Assessment Officer was directed to pay a sum of Rs 10,000 from his personal account to ‘PM Care Fund ‘. [S. 144(C)(3), 246A, 275, Art. 226]
Skoda Auto Volkswagen India Private Ltd. v. NFAC (2022) 214 DTR 281/ 327 CTR 347 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Failure to verify fall in gross profit-Revision of order is not valid-Order of Tribunal is affirmed. [S. 260A]
PCIT v. Rajhans Metal Pvt. Ltd. (Bom.)(HC)(UR)
S. 254(2) : Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Department had withdrawn the Appeal that was pending before the Tribunal based on a Circular No 3 of 2018 dt. 11-7-2018 (2018) 405 ITR 29(St)-Later the Circular was amended and exceptions were added-Department filed miscellaneous application to recall the withdrawn appeal-The Writ petition of Revenue was dismissed. [Art. 226]
PCIT v. Qmax Synthetics Pvt. Ltd. (Bom.)(HC)(UR)
S. 195 : Deduction at source-Non-resident-Collection agent in respect of monies receivable from Indian customers by its Associated enterprise a UAE registered entity-Failure to deduct tax at source-Oder was quashed without making any observations on the merits of the case-Assessing Officer was directed to pass fresh order after giving a reasonable opportunity to the assessee-DTAA-India-UAE. [S. 133(6), 201(1), 201(1A), Art. 5(4), Art. 226]
Directi Services Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (Bom.)(HC)(UR)
S. 151 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Sanction for issue of notice-Approval obtained for issuing notice u/s 148 of the Act is not in accordance with the mandate of section 151-Sanction from Additional Commissioner of Income-tax and not from the PCIT-Notice issued is bad in law hence quashed. [S. 148, Taxation and other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020, Art. 226]
Johnson and Jonson Private Limited v. DCIT (2022) 213 DTR 340/ 326 CTR 868(Bom.)(HC)