S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Limitation-Delay of 86 days-Delay was condoned-High Court directed to dispose of appeals on merits.
PCIT v. Suncity Projects Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 448 ITR 717 /(2023) 290 Taxman 374/ 330 CTR 623/ 222 DTR 191 (SC)S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Limitation-Delay of 86 days-Delay was condoned-High Court directed to dispose of appeals on merits.
PCIT v. Suncity Projects Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 448 ITR 717 /(2023) 290 Taxman 374/ 330 CTR 623/ 222 DTR 191 (SC)S. 245D : Settlement Commission-Settlement of cases-Procedure-Procedure laid down must be followed-Order not following procedure-Not valid-Writ petition pending when Settlement Commission was abolished-Petition to be considered by Interim Board. Principles of natural justice-legal maxim “nemo judex in sua causa debet esse”, No one can be a judge in his own case. [S. 245D(5), 245A, 245B, Art. 226]
Lion Dates Impex (P.) Ltd. v. Chairman, Income-Tax Settlement Commission (No. 2) (2022)448 ITR 436/ 220 DTR 221 /141 taxmann.com 273 / (2023) 331 CTR 351 (Mad.)(HC) Editorial : Decision of single judge in Lion Dates Impex (P.) Ltd. v Chairman, Income-Tax Settlement Commission And Others (No. 1) (2022)448 ITR 422/ 220 DTR 369 /(2023) 331 CTR 398 (Mad)(HC)), set aside.S. 245 : Refunds-Set off of refunds against tax remaining payable-Appeal pending-Entitled to refund of amount adjusted in excess of 20 Per Cent-No order passed either accepting or rejecting–Entitled to refund of amount adjusted in excess of 20 Per Cent. [S. 156, 220(6), 227, Art. 226]
Graphite India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 448 ITR 292 (Cal.)(HC)S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Certificate to Tax Recovery Officer-Attachment and sale of immovable property-Time limit-Order of attachment twenty five years after assessment years-Barred by limitation-Notice of attachment was quashed. [S. 2(25), 2(44), 117, 222, 281B, Schedule II, R, 2, 4, 16, 68B, Art. 226]
Pradeep Alexander v. TRO (2022) 448 ITR 720 / 2023) 334 CTR 439 (Mad.)(HC) Academic Charitable Environmental and Research Foundation v. TRO (2022)448 ITR 720/ (2023) 334 CTR 439 (Mad.)(HC)S. 195 : Deduction at source-Non-resident-Other sums-Double taxation avoidance-Reimbursement of employees of American company-Provisions of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement are more beneficial than the provisions of the Act, it is the Agreement that should be treated as the law that requires to be followed and applied-Certificate for deduction at lower rate or nil deduction-The application under section 195 is at the instance of the person making the payment, while the application under section 197 is at the instance of the recipient-DTAA-India-USA. [S. 40(a))(ia), 90(2), 195(2), 197, Art. 12]
Flipkart Internet Pvt. Ltd. v Dy. CIT(IT) (2022) 448 ITR 268 / 215 DTR 289 / 327 CTR 289 / 288 Taxman 699 (Karn.)(HC)S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Books of account-Loose sheets and diaries do not Constitute to books of account-Assessment based only on evidence available in loose sheets and diaries-Not valid-Transfer of case-Assessee must be given opportunity to be heard–Existence of alternate remedy-Not an absolute bar on issue of Writ. [S. 132, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, S. 34, Art. 226]
Sunil Kumar Sharma v. Dy. CIT (2022) 448 ITR 485 / 220 DTR 241 /(2023) 332 CTR 72 (Karn.)(HC) Kandaswamy Rajendran v. Dy. CIT (2022)448 ITR 485/ 220 DTR 241/ (2023) 332 CTR 72 (Karn.)(HC)S. 153A : Assessment-Search or requisition-Assessment of undisclosed Income-Notice should be based on material seized under Section 132 or documents requisitioned under Section 132A-Notice was quashed. [S. 132, 132A, Art. 226]
Underwater Services Co. Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 448 ITR 691 / 209 DTR 476 / 326 CTR 208 (Bom.)(HC) Samson Maritime Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 448 ITR 691 / 209 DTR 476 / 326 CTR 208 (Bom.)(HC)S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Application of mind by sanctioning authority-Notice valid. [S. 147, 148, Art. 226]
Ideal Associates v. ACIT (2022) 448 ITR 260 / 146 taxmann.com 225(Bom.)(HC)S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Issuing third notice and furnishing specific details of transaction which was subject matter of earlier notice-Failure to explain or substantiate genuineness of transaction in reply-Notice and order for issuance of reassessment notice valid. [S. 147, 148, 148A(d), Art. 226]
Saroj Chandna v. ITO (2022) 448 ITR 28 / 218 DTR 41 / 328 CTR 804 /( 2023) 291 Taxman 233(Delhi)(HC)S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Bogus entities-Vague show cause notice-Matter remanded to issue supplementary notice furnishing details. [S. 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]
Mahashian Di Hatti Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 448 ITR 667 / 328 CTR 731 / 218 DTR 35 (Delhi)(HC)