This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-High-Pitched Assessments-Violation of principle of natural justice-Non application of mind-Gross negligence-Order was quashed-The action taken by the Department in terms of the instructions read with the affidavit referred to in the court’s order dated May 19, 2022 was to be communicated to the assessee by the Department and a compliance report was to be submitted before the court. [S. 147, 148A(d), Art. 226]

Dharmendra Kumar Singh v. UOI (2022) 448 ITR 313 / 215 DTR 93 / 327 CTR 276 (All.)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Transactions of purchase and sale of shares-Notice under Section 148A(d) issued on different ground as reasons in 148A(b)-If Foundational allegation is missing in the notice issued under Section 148A(b)-Same cannot be incorporated by Issuing supplementary notice-Notice was quashed. [S. 147, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Catchy Prop-Build Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 448 ITR 671 / (2023) 291 Taxman 475 (Delhi)(HC), www.itatonline.org

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Recording satisfaction with signature of prescribed authority mandatory-Prescribed Authority’s digitally signed approval obtained after issue of notice without jurisdiction and invalid-Notice and subsequent reassessment proceedings quashed. [S. 147 151, 282A, General Clauses Act, 1897, S. 3(56), Art. 226]

Vikas Gupta v. UOI (2022) 448 ITR 1 / 218 DTR 273 / 328 CTR 1063/ 289 Taxman 443 (All.)(HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Law laid down by Supreme Court not followed-Matter remanded to Assessing Officer. [S. 147, Art. 226]

Pannalal Madan Bai v. ACIT (2022) 448 ITR 298 /(2023) 333 CTR 329/ 226 DTR 217 (Mad.)(HC) Pannalal Kochar v. ACIT (2022) 448 ITR 298 /(2023) 333 CTR 329/ 226 DTR 217(Mad.)(HC) Editorial : Decision of single judge in Pannalal Kochar v. ACIT (2022) 19 ITR-OL 606 //(2023) 333 CTR 333(Mad)(HC)/), Pannalal Madan Bai v. ACIT Pannalal Madan Bai v. ACIT (2023 ) 333 CTR 333 (Mad)( HC) affirmed., affirmed.

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Notice should be issued by Assessing Officer who has jurisdiction over assessee. [S. 129, 147, 148(1), 148(2), Art. 226]

Charu K. Bagadia v. ACIT (No. 2) (2022) 448 ITR 563 / 327 CTR 419 / 215 DTR 361 (Mad.)(HC) Editorial : Decision of the single judge in Charu K. Bagadia v. ACIT (No. 1. (2022) 448 ITR 560 / 327 CTR 431 / 215 DTR 372 (Mad.)(HC) reversed.

S. 147 : Reassessment-Notice-Reasons recorded unfounded-No failure to disclose material facts-Violation of principle of natural justice-Notice without jurisdiction-Strictures-Reassessment done without adhering to the rule of law-Illegal demand and order quashed-Cost of 50,00,000 was awarded on Department-Government to frame Circular-Alternative remedy is not a bar to maintain writ petition. [S. 144B, 148, Art. 226]

S.R. Cold Storage v. UOI (2022) 448 ITR 37 / 217 DTR 102 / 328 CTR 272/ 289 Taxman 580 (All.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Notice-Best judgment assessment-Capital gains-Reasons recorded non-existent-Notice and subsequent reassessment order quashed. [S. 45, 144, 144B, 148, Art. 226]

Prakhar Tandon v. Assessing Officer (2022) 448 ITR 177 / 288 Taxman 133 / 220 DTR 195(All.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Addition made on the basis of for reopening assessment was deleted by CIT(A)-Other income cannot be assessed on the basis of invalid notice. [S. 148]

CIT (E) v. B. P. Poddar Foundation for Education (2022) 448 ITR 695 (Cal.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts-Shares received as gift and their value disclosed in original assessment-Reassessment notice is not valid. [S. 52(vii)(b), 148, Art. 226]

Azim Premji Trustee Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. PCIT (2022) 448 ITR 356 /( 2023) 331 CTR 113/ 222 DTR 75(Karn.)(HC)

S. 145 : Method of accounting-Rejection of accounts-Estimate should be fair-Local knowledge and circumstances of assessee should be taken into consideration-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S. 145(3), 260A]

PCIT v. Smart Value Products and Services Ltd. (2022) 448 ITR 145 (HP)(HC)