This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 147 : Reassessment – Change of opinion- Initiation of reassessment proceedings merely on the basis of change of opinion is invalid [S. 10(23G), 40(a),148, 260A]
ABB India Ltd. v. JCIT (2022) 219 DTR 170 / 115 CCH 235 /(2023)451 ITR 489 (Karn) (HC)
S. 69 : Unexplained investments – Onus is on the assessee to explain the cash deposits and if no explanation is given, the amount can be assessed as assessee’s income. [S. 68, 260A ]
C.K. Ramakrishna v. ITO (2022) 212 DTR 74 / 325 CTR 560 (Karn)(HC)
S. 68 : Cash credits – Firm – Capital account- Onus was on assessee firm to prove the capacity of the partners who introduced cash as capital in the assessee firm – Amendment brought by Finance Act, 2021 which requires establishment of ‘source of source’ is clarificatory in nature. [S. 260A]
Basanta Maharana v. ITO (2022) 218 DTR 62 / 328 CTR 993 (Orissa)(HC)
S. 12AA : Cancellation of registration-Trust or institution-Survey-No incriminating material was found-Accommodation entries- Cancellation of registration without giving an opportunity of cross examination is not valid. [S. 12A, 133A]
CIT(E) v. Mayapur Dham Pilgrim & Visitors trust (2022) 214 DTR 441 /328 CTR 984 (Cal)(HC)
S.147: Reassessment – After the expiry of four years – Valuation of equity shares – Share premium – Income from other sources – No failure to disclose material facts – Notice of reassessment and order disposing objection was quashed .[ S. 56(2) (viib), 148 , Art , 226 ]
The Suminter Organic and Fair Trade Cotton Ginning Mill Pvt Ltd v .Dy.CIT ( Bom)( HC). www.itatonline .org
S.147: Reassessment – After the expiry of four years – Loans and advances to sister concern – Allegation of colourable device – No failure to disclose material facts – Notice of reassessment and order disposing objection was quashed . [S. 69, 148 , Art , 226 ]
Konark Life Spaces v .ACIT (2023] 149 taxmann.com 489 / 455 ITR 103 ( Bom)( HC) www.itatonline .org ( Bom)( HC) www.itatonline .org
S. 292CC : Authorisation and assessment in case of search or requisition-Separately in the name of each person-Validity-Search was conducted after introduction of section 292CC and not by applying provision retrospectively-Amendment is clarificatory in nature-Challenge to constitutional validity of section 292CC was rejected. [S. 132,132A, Art. 226]
SRS Mining v. UOI (2022) 328 CTR 510 / 217 DTR 321 /141 taxmann.com 272 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Withdrawal of application-Rejection of prayer for withdrawal of application-decided the application on merit-Directed the Commissioner to decide the application for withdrawal as expeditiously as possible. [Art. 226]
Rajendra Singh v. UOI (2022) 217 DTR 433 / 328 CTR 915 / 144 taxmann.com 167/(2023) 291 Taxman 168 (MP)(HC)/Kaiteshwari Devi (Smt ) v UOI 217 DTR 433 / 328 CTR 915 ( MP )( HC)
S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Duties-Remand by High Court-Industrial undertakings-Infrastructure development-Industrial Park-Tribunal is required to record finding of its own and could not merely remand matter to Assessing Officer. [S. 80IA(4)(iii]
Gopalan Enterprises (India) (P) Ltd. v. CIT (2022) 217 DTR 241 / 140 taxmann.com 235 (Karn.)(HC)
S. 226 : Collection and recovery-Modes of recovery-Stay-Deduction at source-Interest-Bank deposits-Failure to deduct or pay-Application for stay of demand was dismissed-Directed to deposit 20 per cent of total demand-DTAA-India-China. [S. 201 (1), Art. 11(3), Art. 226]
Tata Teleservices Ltd. v. CIT (2022) 216 DTR 286 / 145 taxmann.com 142 (Delhi)(HC)