S. 132B : Application of seized or requisitioned assets-Cash seized-Assessment quashed-Direction issued to dispose pending application expeditiously. [S. 132, 132B(4)(b), 244A, Art. 226]
Yogendra Kumar Gupta v. PCIT (2022) 447 ITR 775 (Delhi)(HC)S. 132B : Application of seized or requisitioned assets-Cash seized-Assessment quashed-Direction issued to dispose pending application expeditiously. [S. 132, 132B(4)(b), 244A, Art. 226]
Yogendra Kumar Gupta v. PCIT (2022) 447 ITR 775 (Delhi)(HC)S. 127 : Power to transfer cases-Order of transfer to facilitate investigation in to evasion of tax-Order of transfer is valid. [S. 124(1), Art. 226]
Kamlesh Rajnikant Shah v. PCIT (2022) 447 ITR 196/ 287 Taxman 504/ (2023) 333 CTR 709 (Guj.)(HC)S. 127 : Power to transfer cases-Assessee aware of real reason for transfer of case-Natural justice-Public interest can justify Violation of principle of Audi Alteram Partem. [Art. 226]
Aditya Tripathi v. PCIT (2022) 447 ITR 469 / 326 CTR 833 / 287 Taxman 144 (MP)(HC)S. 115JB : Book profit-Electricity-Provisions as it stood prior to amendment not applicable to electric company.
PCIT v. Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. (2022) 447 ITR 186 (Raj.)(HC)S. 115JB : Book profit-Provisions not applicable to Electricity Boards or similar entities totally owned by State or Central Government.
Dy. CIT v. Kerala State Electricity Board (2022) 447 ITR 193/ 288 Taxman 728 / 217 DTR 161/ 328 CTR 265(SC) Editorial : Kerala State Electricity Board v. Dy. CIT (2010) 329 ITR 91 / 2011) 196 Taxman 1 (Ker)(HC)S. 80P : Co-operative societies-Regional Rural Bank deemed to be Co-Operative society-Entitled to deduction. [S. 80P(2)(a)(i), 80P(4), 271(1)(c), Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976, S. 3, 22]
PCIT v. Baroda Uttar Pradesh Gramin Bank (2022) 447 ITR 218 (All.)(HC)S. 80IA : Industrial undertakings-Power generation units I and II constituted un undertaking-Entitled to deduction.
CIT v. Apollo Tyres Ltd. (No. 2) (2022) 447 ITR 391 (Ker.)(HC) CIT v. Apollo Tyres Ltd. (No. 3) (2022) 447 ITR 393 (Ker.)(HC)S. 80IA : Industrial undertakings-Infrastructure development-On facts held to be not allowable-No substantial question of law. [S.260A]
CIT v. Apollo Tyres Ltd. (No. 1) (2022) 447 ITR 377 (Ker.)(HC)S. 80HHC : Export business-Unabsorbed losses to be taken into account before computing deduction.
Ashok Leyland Ltd. v. CIT (2022) 447 ITR 661/ 219 DTR 498/ 329 CTR 462 / (2023) 290 Taxman 120 (SC) Editorial : CIT v. Ashok Leyland Ltd (2008) 297 ITR 107 (Mad.)(HC), affirmed.S. 80G : Donation-Renewal of approval-Question whether or not the income had been applied for charitable purpose cannot be looked while granting the renewal-Renewal of approval of the assessee-trust under section 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was correct. [S. 11, 12, 80G(5)(ii)]
DIT (E) v. D. R. Ranka Charitable Trust (2022) 447 ITR 766 / 220 DTR 141 / 329 CTR 690/ 289 Taxman 617 (SC) Editorial: Decision of the Karnataka High Court affirmed D. R. Ranka Charitable Trust v. DIT(E). (ITA No. 180 of 2010 dt 20-11-2018)