This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 153C: Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Loose Sheets of papers not shown to form part of books of accounts regularly maintained by assessee would not constitute material evidence-Reasonable opportunity to be provided to assessee before transfer of case in accordance with S. 127-Satisfaction Note to be recorded for each assessment year separately. [S. 127, 132, 153A, Art. 226]

DCIT v. Sunil Kumar Sharma (2024) 469 ITR 197 / 159 taxmann.com 179 (Karn)(HC) Editorial :SLP of Revenue is dismissed, Dy.CIT v. Sunil Kumar Sharma (2024) 469 ITR 271/ 168 taxmann.com 77/ 302 Taxman 9 (SC)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search and seizure-Material pursuant to a search is relied upon-Assessing Officer is required to follow procedure as contemplated under section 153A, 153B and 153C and it is impermissible for Assessing Officer to continue regular assessment.[S. 132, 133A, 143(3), 153A, 260A]

PCIT v. VSL Mining Company (P.) Ltd. (2024) 301 Taxman 631 (Karn)(HC)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search or requisition-Search had been conducted on 13-10-2010 and assessments in question were for year 2005-06 to 2007-08 which had been unabated/concluded as on date of search-Assessing Officer is precluded from making any addition to return of income, in absence of incriminating material found as a result of search-The completed/unabated assessments can be reopened by the Assessing Officer in exercise of powers under section 147/148 subject to fulfilment of conditions as envisaged under the said provisions and as may be permissible in law. [S. 132,132A 147, 148, 260A]

PCIT v. Welspun India Ltd. (2024) 301 Taxman 575 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 153 : Assessment-Limitation-Failure to pass the order within six months from the date of communication of the Tribunal order-Appellate Tribunal restored the matter to the file of AO with directions to comply with the same within 6 months-Assessment order passed beyond the stipulated timeline provided by the ITAT is barred by limitation.[S.153(3), 254(1) Art.226, 265]

Ramesh Chawla (HUF) v. ITO (2024) 301 Taxman 44 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Mere use of expression Yes I am satisfied could not be considered to be a valid approval-Non application of mind-Reassessment notice is quashed. [S.143(1), 147, 148, Art. 226]

Capital Broadways (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2024) 301 Taxman 506 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice –Recording of satisfaction-No mandate for the Pr. CIT to record his own reasons for approval or satisfaction-It would be sufficed that the Pr. CIT recorded the satisfaction regarding the reasons recorded by the AO-Writ petition is dismissed.[S. 148, Art.226]

Venky Steels (P.) Ltd. v. CIT (2024) 301 Taxman 344 (Patna)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Notice under section. 148A(b) is issued in the name of dead person-Notice and order is quashed-Even otherwise, since tax had already been deducted on salary income, as was evident from Form-16, reassessment action leading to demand of tax could not be initiated against assessee or even his legal representatives is not valid. [S. 15, 148, 148A(b), 1488A(d), 192, Form No 16, Art. 226]

Meenu Gupta v. Asstt. CIT (2024) 301 Taxman 421 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Faceless assessment-Notice issue by jurisdictional AO and not by faceless AO-Bad in law hence quashed.[S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), 151A, Art. 226]

Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. ACIT (2024) 301 Taxman 20 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Limitation-Assessee had not initiated any legal proceedings to assail the notice dated 30.06.2021 issued under section 148-Subsequent notice issued under section 148A(b) pursuant to decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in UOI v Ashish Agarwal (2022) 286 Taxman 183/ 444 ITR 1 (SC) is barred by limitation. [S. 148, 148A(b) 148A(d) 149, Art. 226]

Genpat India (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT, OSD (2024) 301 Taxman 126 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148A: Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice under section 148-decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of UOI v. Ashish Agarwal [2022] 444 ITR 1 (SC) does not mandate reopening of completed assessment.[S. 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Satish Chand Jain v. ACIT (2024) 301 Taxman 27 (Delhi)(HC)