This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Commission-Directors or relatives-None of them was shown to have any expertise in procuring Iron Ore Fines (IOF) from Indian markets-Disallowing is justified.
Oripol Industries Ltd. v. JCIT (2022) 288 Taxman 772 / 215 DTR 444 / 327 CTR 606 / (2023)451 ITR 379 (Orissa)(HC)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Transportation charges-Reimbursement of expenses-Disallowance is not justified.
Maa Mangala Enterprises v. ITO (2022) 288 Taxman 124 (Orissa) (HC)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Road development-Public Road-Road belonged to Zila Parishad-Allowable as revenue expenditure. [S. 35E]
CIT v. Integrated Coal Mining Ltd. (2022) 288 Taxman 783 / 218 DTR 303 / 329 CTR 517 /(2023)456 ITR 178/(2023)456 ITR 178(Cal.)(HC)
S. 32 : Depreciation-Bottles and crates-Business of manufacturing and sales of soft drinks-Plant-Bottles and crates used for bottling soft drinks manufactured would be included in definition of plant-Eligible for 100 per cent depreciation. [S. 32(1)(i), 43(3)]
Parle Bisleri (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 288 Taxman 673/(2023) 457 ITR 130 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 32 : Depreciation-Additional Depreciation-All component/parts of a plant acquired prior to 31-3-2005-Fitted to plant thereafter-Eligible additional depreciation. [S. 32(1)(iia)]
National Aluminium Co. Ltd. v. CIT (2022) 288 Taxman 36 / 215 DTR 375 / 327 CTR 340 / (2023)451 ITR 383 (Orissa) (HC)