S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Delay of 174 days-Delay was condoned.
PCIT v. Ratan Kumar Somani (2022) 139 taxmann.com 37 (Cal.)(HC) Editorial : SLP of assessee dismissed, Ratan Kumar Somani v. Pr. CIT (2022) 287 Taxman 294 /114 CCH 61 (SC)S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Delay of 174 days-Delay was condoned.
PCIT v. Ratan Kumar Somani (2022) 139 taxmann.com 37 (Cal.)(HC) Editorial : SLP of assessee dismissed, Ratan Kumar Somani v. Pr. CIT (2022) 287 Taxman 294 /114 CCH 61 (SC)S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Delay of 545 days-Administrative exigency-Delay was condoned.
Inland World Logistics (P) Ltd. v. Pr. CIT (2022) 139 taxmann.com 314 (Cal.)(HC) Editorial : SLP of assessee dismissed, Inland World Logistics (P) Ltd. v. Pr. CIT (2022) 287 Taxman 377/114 CCH 59 (SC)S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Territorial Jurisdiction-Assessment was initiated at New Delhi and final assessment was framed by Assessing Officer at Ghaziabad-High Court of Punjab and Haryana lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate matter.
PCIT v. ABC Papers Ltd. v. ABC Papers Ltd. (2022) 139 taxmann.com 312 (P&H)(HC) Editorial: SLP granted to Revenue, PCIT v. ABC Papers Ltd. (2022) 287 Taxman 393 / 114 CCH 322 (SC)S. 241A : Refunds-Withholding of refund in certain cases-Estimated tax liability-Revenue neutral-Method of accounting-Income offered for tax when services were rendered-Withholding of tax is held to be not valid. [S. 143(3), 145]
Ericsson India (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 287 Taxman 230/ 113 CCH 330 / 217 DTR 414/ 328 CTR 649/(2023) 456 ITR 523(Delhi)(HC)S. 234D : Interest on excess refund-Provision inserted from 1-6-2003 would apply to all regular assessments made on or after 1-6-2003 irrespective of assessment year involved-Liable to pay interest.
CIT v. Lakshmi Vilas Bank Ltd. (2022) 287 Taxman 333 / 113 CCH 336 (Mad.)(HC)S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Notice u/s 148 issued on 30-6-2021 without complying with mandatory provisions-Order is quashed-, Explanations to Notifications dated 31-3-2021 and 27-4-2021 issued by CBDT were to be declared ultra vires of 1961 Act and TLA Act, 2020. [S. 148, 151 Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020, S. 3, Art. 226]
Mohammed Mustafa v. ITO (2022) 287 Taxman 277/114 CCH 59 (/ 214 DTR 108Karn.)(HC)S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Reassessment notice issued under section 148 on 30-6-2021 without complying with substituted provisions of section 148A was quashed. [S. 148 Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 S. 3]
ACIT v. Kirti Singh (2022) 138 taxmann.com 216 (All.)(HC) Editorial : Notice issued in SLP filed the Revenue, ACIT v. Kirti Singh (2022) 287 Taxman 647 (SC), Refer, UOI v. Ashish Agarwal (2022) 286 Taxman 183 (SC)S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Notice for assessment year 2013-14 was issued to assessee on 1-4-2021-limitation of issuing notice expired on 31-3-2021-Notice was time barred-Direction-CBDT-Since large number of writ petitions are being filed in which date and time of issuance of notice under section 148 are in dispute, Income-tax department to be directed to ensure that date and time of triggering of e-mail for issuing notices and orders are reflected in online portal relating to concerned assesses-Unless there is a stay obtained by authorities under Income-tax Act, 1961 from higher forum, mere fact of filing appeal or SLP will not entitle authority not to comply with order of High Court-Court directed the Registrar General to forward the copy of the judgement for circulating amongst authorities under the Income tax- Act , 19961 and for the observance of the principles of the judicial discipline and propriety. [S. 147, 260A, Art. 226]
Mohan Lal Santwani v. UOI (2022) 449 ITR 476/ 287 Taxman 634 / 218 DTR 313 / 329 CTR 113(All.)(HC)S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Failure to dispose objections by passing speaking order-Order set aside for adjudication afresh. [S. 143(3), 147, Art. 226]
Kausalya Maruthachalam v. ACIT (2022) 287 Taxman 7/113 CCH 298 (Mad.)(HC)S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Validity of E-notices-Mere digitally signing of notice under section 148 would not be issuance of notice, reassessment notices would be said to be digitally issued on date when same were e-mailed to petitioner-Since deadline for passing assessment order in most cases was 31-3-2022, proceedings pursuant to impugned reassessment notices were to be stayed till further orders. [S. 147, 149, Art. 226]
Sharad Garg v. ITO (2022) 287 Taxman 207/113 CCH 213 (Delhi)(HC)