This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Interest on borrowed capital-Travel expenses-Question of fact-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S. 36(1)(iii), 37(1)]

PCIT v. Utech Developers Ltd. (2022) 446 ITR 198/ 289 Taxman 259 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Jurisdiction-Registered Office at Bangalore-Appeal filed at Delhi is not maintainable-Liberty is given to file appeal having jurisdiction.

PCIT v. Phoenix Lamps Ltd. (No. 1) (2022) 446 ITR 415 (Delhi)(HC) PCIT v. Phoenix Lamps Ltd. (No. 2) (2022) 446 ITR 417 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 245C : Settlement Commission-Settlement of cases-Full disclosure, co-operation with Commission-Disclosing Foreign Bank Accounts and extent of money available in them and filing affidavit narrating transfer of funds-Offer to be treated as true and full disclosure-Not to be treated as non-Co-operation-Mandatory personal hearing was not granted-Violation of principle of natural justice-Matter remanded to Settlement Commission. [S. 245D, 245D(3), Income-Tax Settlement Commission (Procedure) Rules, 1997, R. 6, 8, 9,9A, 15 Art. 226]

Kandathil M. Mammen v. ITSC (2022) 446 ITR 595/ 218 DTR 65 /329 CTR 839 / 289 Taxman 347 (Mad.)(HC) Arun Mammen v. ITSC (2022) 446 ITR 595/ 218 DTR 65 /329 CTR 839 / 289 Taxman 347 (Mad.)(HC) Editorial : Decision of the single judge in Arun Mamen v. ITSC (2021) 438 ITR 378 (Mad)(HC) reversed.

S. 226 : Collection and recovery-Modes of recovery-Pendency of appeal before CIT(A)-Freezing of bank accounts and demand recovered-Directed to file application to expedite hearing before National Faceless Appeal Centre. [S. 246A, Art. 226]

Priti Nanda v. CIT (Appeals) (2022) 446 ITR 513 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Stay of demand-Commissioner (Appeals) being Quasi-Judicial Authority is not bound by administrative circulars issued by Central Board Of Direct Taxes-Deposit of 20% of the outstanding demand is not mandatory-CIT(A) has to apply is mind independently-Matter remanded. [S. 220(6), 246A, Art. 226]

APR Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (Appeals) (2022) 446 ITR 275 / 214 DTR 313/ 327 CTR 113(Telangana)(HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Stay of demand-Deposit of 20 Per Cent. of demand-Order is held to be justified. [Art. 226]

Mascot Construction Co. v. PCIT (2022) 446 ITR 719 / 213 DTR 449 / 326 CTR 863 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 197 : Deduction at source-Certificate for lower rate-Certificate of nil deduction-Non-Resident-Payments received from ONGC for work done inside and outside India-Powers of Assessing Officer while considering application for certificate-Difference of opinion between members of division bench-Matter to be referred to appropriate Bench-DTAA-India-The United Arab Emirates. [R. 28, 28AA, Art. 7]

National Petroleum Construction Co. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 446 ITR 382 / 216 DTR 241 / 327 CTR 617 / 289 Taxman 87(SC) Editorial : National Petroleum Construction Co. v. Dy. CIT (2020) 421 ITR 24 / 185 DTR 57/ 312 CTR 217 / 271 Taxman 150 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 154 : Rectification of mistake-Book profits-Amounts disallowed under Section 14A cannot be added back to book profits-Debatable issue rectification order is not valid. [S. 14A, 115JB]

PCIT v. J. J. Glastronics Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 446 ITR 712 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search or requisition-Undisclosed income-Amounts credited to employees account-Admission by employees that the amount belong to the assessee-Peak and gross profit theory-Not accepted-Addition is held to be justified. [S. 132, 133A]

K. A. Rauf v. CIT (2022) 446 ITR 421 / 215 DTR 13/ 328 CTR 920 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Request for adjournment to file response not granted-Assessing authority obliged to decide dispute in respect of a mount involved in transaction with reference to material submitted by assessee. [S. 148, 149, Art. 226]

Urmila v. ITO (2022) 446 ITR 511/ 218 DTR 60 / 328 CTR 734(Raj.)(HC)/Surya Prakash v.ITO 2022)446 ITR 511/ 218 DTR 60 / 328 CTR 734 (Raj)(HC)/Vaijanti Dadhich v .ITO ( 2022)446 ITR 511/ 218 DTR 60 / 328 CTR 734 (Raj)(HC)