This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 80P : Co-operative societies-A co-operative society registered under Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, 1997 would be construed as co-operative society-Entitle to claim benefit.[S. 2(19)]
Sri Martha Vividoddesha Pathima Souharda Sahakarii Niyamitha v. UOI (2022) 285 Taxman 230 (Karn.)(HC)
S. 80IB(10) : Housing projects-Interest on fixed deposits-Derived from business-No other source of income-Deduction allowable. [S. 2(13), 56, 80IA]
PCIT v. West Bengal Hosing Board (2022) 285 Taxmman 32 (Cal.)(HC)
S. 80IB(10) : Housing projects-Total area exceeded 15000 sq.ft-Not entitle to deedcution. [S. 80IB(10)(c)]
South City Projects (Kolkata) Ltd. v. PCIT (2022) 285 Taxman 696 (Cal.)(HC)
S. 80IB(10) : Housing projects-Amendment brought on 1-4-2020 vide caluses (e) and (f) to section 80IB(10) is prospective in nature-Unaccounted money found in the course of search-Dedcution u/s. 80IB(10) cannot be denied.
Mandavi Builders v. Dy. CIT (2021) 133 taxmann.com 413 (Karn.)(HC) Editorial : SLP is granted to the revenue; DCIT v. Mandavi Builders. (2022) 285 Taxman 4 (SC)
S. 80IB(10) : Housing projects-Prportionate deduction-matter reamnded to the Assessing Officer to adjudicate as to when flats in question were allotted and then to decide claim of assessee.
Mandavi Builders v. Dy.CIT (2022) 135 taxmann.com 119 (Karn.)(HC) Editorial : SLP is granted to the revenue; DCIT v. Mandavi Builders. (2022) 285 Taxman 365 (SC)
S. 69A : Unexplained money-Alterntive remedy-Writ is not maintainable-Stautorty appeal is the remedy. [S. 246A, Art. 226]
Arunachalam Nadar Muthuraj v. ITO (2022) 441 ITR 107/ 285 Taxman 415 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 45(3) : Capital gains-Transfer of capital asset to firm-Firm-Partner-Tranfer at book value-Revaluation of asset by firm-Tranfer of land to partnership firm only agreed value agreed between partners at which asset is transferred by a partner to firm has to be considered-Addition cannot be made on notional basis. [S. 10(2A), 147, 148]
PCIT v. Orchid Griha Nirman Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 285 Taxman 368 (Cal.)(HC) Editorial : Order of ITAT, in ITO v. Orchid Nirman (P) (Ltd.) (2016) 161 ITD 818 (Kol.)(Trib.), affirmed.