This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 2(5B) : Charge of tax-Financial company-Transfer of distribution business to a new company-Matter remanded-Interpretation of taxing statute-Charging provision must be construed strictly. [S. 2(7)]
Dadha Pharma (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2022) 442 ITR 93 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 281B : Provisional attachment-Power must not be exercised in an arbitrary manner-Recovery proceedings against assignee of Partner’s Share in firm-Provisional Attachment Of Property Of Firm is not valid-Interpretation of taxing statute-The golden rule of interpretation of statutes is that the statute has to be construed according to its plain, literal and grammatical meaning, unless it leads to absurdity. [Indian Partnership Act, 1932, S. 29]
Raghunandan Enterprise v. ACIT (2022)442 ITR 460 / 211 DTR 345 / 328 CTR 99(Guj.)(HC)
S. 276C : Offences and prosecutions-Wilful attempt to evade tax-Self assessment-Default in payment of tax on time-Paying tax in instalments-No mala fide intention to evade tax. [S. 140A(3), 226, 276(2)]
S. P. Velayutham v. ACIT (2022) 442 ITR 74/ 215 DTR 265/327 CTR 779 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 271C : Penalty-Failure to deduct at source-Interest on fixed deposits-Agra Development Authority-Statutory Body-Not liable to deduct tax at source-Levy of penalty is not valid. [S. 194A(3)(iii)(f), Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning And Development Act, 1973]
Union Bank of India v. Add. CIT (TDS) (2022) 442 ITR 194 / 211 DTR 308 / 325 CTR 505 / 286 Taxman 353 (SC)
S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Faceless penalty scheme-rejection of request for personal hearing-Order set aside. [S. 144B, 274, Art. 226]
Ramco Cements Ltd. v. NFAC (2022)442 ITR 279/ 327 CTR 231 /215 DTR 199 / 139 taxmann.com 89 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Binding precedent-Subordinate Authority to follow the ruing of Higher Authority-Rejection of revision petition on ground that appeal pending in High Court on similar issue against order of Tribunal-Held to be not proper-Matter remanded for de novo consideration. [S. 260, Art. 226]
Karanja Terminal and Logistic Pvt. Ltd. v. PCIT (2022) 442 ITR 400 / 211 DTR 161 / 325 CTR 392 / 287 Taxman 410 Bom.)(HC)
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Order passed after enquiry-Order not erroneous-Free trade zone-Not necessary to maintain separate books of accounting for export unit-Circular and instructions-Binding on Income-Tax Authorities. [S. 10A, 119]
Virtusa Consulting Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 442 ITR 385 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 254(2A) : Appellate Tribunal-Stay-Delay in proceedings not attributable to assessee-Tribunal has the power to grant stay even beyond period of 365 days. [S. 254(1)]
PCIT v. Michelin India Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 442 ITR 268 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 245A : Settlement Commission-Cessation of Settlement Commission-Pendency of proceedings as on 31-1-2021-Constitutional validity of provision-Directions are issued to consider the applications by the Interim Board would be if the proceedings were pending as on January 31, 2021. [S. 245C, Art. 14, 19(1)(g), 20(2), 21, 226]
Pitchai Rajagopal Shiva Kumaar v. UOI (2022) 442 ITR 33 / 212 DTR 401 / 326 CTR 219 (Mad.)(HC)