This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 245D : Settlement Commission-Violation of principle of natural justice-No opportunity is given to raise objections to order-Order of Settlement Commission is set a-side. [S. 245C, 245D(3), 245D(4), Art. 226]
Swamina International Pvt. Ltd. v. ITSC (2022) 442 ITR 343 / 286 Taxman 26/ 214 DTR 175 / 327 CTR 684(Cal.)(HC)
S. 245 : Refund-Set off of refunds against tax remaining payable–Opportunity of hearing not provided before adjustment-Entitled to refund of adjustments in excess of 20 Per Cent. [S. 156, 220, 227, Art. 226]
Ramesth Constructions Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 442 ITR 181 / 209 DTR 462 / 324 CTR 337 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 244A : Refund-Interest on refunds-Deduction of tax at source-Excess deduction-Interest payable to deductor-Interest to be calculated from payment of tax. [S. 195(2)]
Rohan Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO(IT). (2022) 442 ITR 404 / 211 DTR 164 / 325 CTR 395 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 237 : Refunds-Reassessment-Failure to file returns within time-Notice of reassessment must be issued-Procedure laid down in Income-Tax Act must be followed by Income-Tax Authorities-Directed to examine the claim of refund within a period of three months. [S. 119, 147, 148, Art. 226]
R. Pannerselvam v. PCIT (2022) 442 ITR 376 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Adjustment of refund in excess of 20 Per Cent of tax in dispute-Held to be not valid-Directed to refund adjustment made in excess of 20 per cent-Stay granted till disposal of appeal by CIT(A). [S. 156, 220(6), 245, Art. 226]
Aditi Infrabuild and Services Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 442 ITR 50 (Delhi) (HC)
S. 192 : Deduction at source-Salary-Failure to deduct ta at source-Plea of bona fide belief based on circular issued by employer for its own use-No clarification by Income-Tax Authorities-Levy of interest is valid. [S. 10(5), 133A, 201(1), 201(1A), R. 2B]
State Bank of India v. ACIT (TDS) (2022) 442 ITR 363 (Karn.)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-All relevant material in respect of employee costs reimbursed to overseas subsidiaries furnished in the course of original assessment proceedings-Change of opinion-Reassessment notice is not valid. [S. 92CA, 148, Art. 226]
Oracle Financial Services Software Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 286 Taxman 469 //(2023)452 ITR 272 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 145 : Method of accounting-Business expenditure-Advertisement expenditure-Allowable as revenue expenditure-Method of accounting-v Proportionate completion method-Profits Accounted for chit discount on completed contract method-Revenue neutral-Method of accounting justified. [S. 37(1), Chit Funds Act, 1982, 21(1(b)]
Shriram Chits and Investments (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2013) 85 DTR 144/ 85 Taman 356 / (2022) 442 ITR 54 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Assessment Proceedings on remand-Procedure must be followed-Order is held to be not valid. [S. 92CA(4)]
Volex Interconnect (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 442 ITR 425 (Mad.)(HC)