This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Transfer of rights-Transfer is genuine-Set off credit-No evidence-Deletion of addition is valid. [ S. 28(iv) ]

CIT v. Tube Investments of India Ltd. (2022) 446 ITR 676 / 288 Taxman 524 / 220 DTR 383 / 329 CTR 986 (Mad.)(HC). Editorial : SLP of Revenue dismissed , CIT v. Tube Investments of India Ltd. (2023) 292 Taxman 465 (SC)/ CIT v. Tube Investments of India (P.) Ltd. (2023) 292 Taxman 546 (SC)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Income or capital-Subsidy received from Government for upgrading of Infrastructure facilities-Capital receipt. [S. 115JB]

CIT (E) v. Narmada Clean Tech Ltd. (2022) 446 ITR 366 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Income or capital-Sale of Carbon Credits-No cost of acquisition-Capital receipt-Subsidy-Technology upgradation fund-Compensation on non-performance of the energy generation-Capital receipt. [S. 28(i), 80IA]

CIT v. BEST Corporation Ltd. (2022) 446 ITR 211 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 56 : Income from other sources –Stamp value – Market value of flat on agreement date is to be considered and not the value of registration of sale agreement -Addition is deleted . [ S. 45 , 56(2)(vii)(b) ]

Sanjraj Mehta v .ITO (Mum)( Trib) www.itatonline .org

S. 154 : Rectification of mistake -Inadvertent mistake by assessee- The AO has to rectify the said mistake [ S. 143(1)]

Poorvanchal Vikas Foundation v .ITO (2022) The Chamber’s Journal – September – P. 134( Varanasi)( Trib )

S. 32 : Depreciation – Block of asset – Asset not put to use in the current year or subsequent year – Depreciation cannot be disallowed [ S. 2(11) , 32(2) ]

Beeya Overseas Ltd v .DCIT (2022) The Chamber’s Journal – September – P. 133( Kol)( Trib )

Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act , 2020

S.7: No refund of amount paid – Refund – Interest @ 5 % to be paid along with refund for delay beyond 90 days [S.3, 4, Art , 226 ]

Anjul ( Mrs ) v .PCIT (2022) The Chamber’s Journal – September – P. 124( Delhi )(HC)

S. 276CC : Offences and prosecutions – Failure to furnish return of income – Trail Court in 81 cases took cognizance of tax evasion due to failure to file return – High Court quashed the Trail Court order and directed to pass a speaking order . [ S. 153A, 279, Code of Criminal Procedure S 397, 482 ]

Ashish Agarwal v. Income -tax department (2022) 143 taxmann.com 322 ( Raj )(HC)

S. 244A : Refunds – Interest on refunds -Reduction in taxable income – Eligible on the sum refundable due to recomputation [ S. 220(2) 234D, 244A(1)(b) ]

PCIT v. Punjab & Sind Bank ( 2022) 218 DTR 231/ The Chamber’s Journal – September – P. 129( Delhi)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment – Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice – Professional income not shown – Assessment u/s 143(1) -Reassessment notice is valid – DTAA- India -USA . [ Art , 15 , Art.226 ]

Ernst and Young U.S .LLP v . ACIT ( 2022) 449 ITR 425/ (2023) 146 taxmann.com 64 /( 2022) The Chamber’s Journal – September – P. 125( Delhi)(HC)