S. 148 : Reassessment-Objections raised-Not disposed by Assessing Officer-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer to dispose of objections by speaking order [S. 143(2),147, Art, 226]
Jothi Malleables P. Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 441 ITR 70 (Mad.)(HC)S. 148 : Reassessment-Objections raised-Not disposed by Assessing Officer-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer to dispose of objections by speaking order [S. 143(2),147, Art, 226]
Jothi Malleables P. Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 441 ITR 70 (Mad.)(HC)S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Participated in reassessment proceedings Final decision is not taken-Writ is premature-Dismissed. [S. 147, Art. 226]
Exotica Promoters LLP v. ITO (2022) 441 ITR 533 (Gauhati)(HC)S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Death of the assessee-Notice issued in the name of deceased-Assessment order and consequent notices are set aside. [S. 144B, 147, 221(1), 271(1)(b), Art. 226]
Dharamraj v. ITO (2022) 441 ITR 462 (Delhi)(HC)S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Constitutional validity-The delegation authorized being only for the purpose of enlarging limitation under a valid law, such delegation could not be exercised to resurrect the provision of law that stood omitted from the statute book by virtue of its substitution made by the Finance Act, 2021, w.e.f. 01.04.2021-Reassessment notices issued under section 148 of the Act are quashed. [S. 147, 148A, 149, 151, 151A, 153, 292 Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 (TOLA), S. 3(1) of the Act 38 of 2020, Art. 226]
Bagaria Properties and Investment Pvt. Ltd. v. UOI (2022) 441 ITR 359 / 209 DTR 449 / 324 CTR 449 (Cal.)(HC) Manoj Jain v. UOI (2022) 441 ITR 418 (Cal.)(HC) Mon Mohan Kohli v. CIT (2022)441 ITR 207 / 209 DTR 65 / 324 CTR 28 (Delhi)(HC) Vikrant Suri v. ITO (2022) 441 ITR 726 (Delhi) (HC) Sudesh Taneja v. ITO (2022) 442 ITR 289 / 210 DTR 1005 / 324 CTR 577 / 286 Taxman 284 (Raj.)(HC) Vellore Institute of Technology v. CBDT (2022) 442 ITR 233 / 211 DTR 233 / 325 CTR 148 (Mad.)(HC) Bharati Hiren Uttamchandani v. UOI (2022) 285 Taxman 385 (Guj.)(HC) Dharmendra Gupta (HUF) v. ITO (2022) 285 Taxman 484 (Raj.)(HC)/Jalaj Joshi. v. ACIT (2022] 286 Taxman 688 (Raj)(HC)/Mohammed Mustafa v. ITO (2022)445 ITR 608/ 214 DTR 108/ 326 CTR 759/ 287 Taxman 277 (Karn)(HC)S. 147 : Reassessment-Revaluation of asset of firm-Transfer of revalued reserve to partners’ accounts-Section 45(3) is applicable in year of transfer of capital asset by partner to firm by way of capital contribution-Re valuation is not colourable device-Reassessment is not valid. [S. 10(2A) 45(3) 148, 260A]
PCIT v. Blue Heaven Griha Nirman Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 441 ITR 621 /285 Taxman 663 / 211 DTR 376 / 326 CTR 74 (Cal.)(HC) PCIT v. Wellgrowth Grihanirman Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 441 ITR 621 / 285 Taxman 663 / 211 DTR 376 / 326 CTR 74 (Cal.) (HC) PCIT v. Orchid Griah Nirman Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 441 ITR 621 / 285 Taxman 368 / 211 DTR 376 / 326 CTR 74 (Cal.) (HC)/Editorial : SLP of Revenue is dismissed, PCIT v. Blue Heaven Griha Nirman (P.) Ltd. (2023) 295 Taxman 11 (SC)S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Issue of notice and draft assessment prior to final assessment order-Violation of principle of natural justice-Order set aside. [S. 143(3), 270A]
Pardesi Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. NAFAC (2022) 441 ITR 696 (Delhi) (HC)S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Natural justice-Merely reproducing content of assessees replies to notices is not sufficient-Matter remanded for passing order. [Art. 226]
Vellaian Selvaraj v. ACIT (2022) 441 ITR 644/ 213 DTR 309 / 326 CTR 550 (Mad.)(HC) Kumaravel Muthiah Mallika v. ACIT (2022) 441 ITR 644 / 213 DTR 309 (Mad.) (HC)S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Draft assessment order-Final notice with draft assessment order not served-Assessment order not valid. [S. 144B(1)(xvi), 144B(xxii), Art. 226]
Idex India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 441 ITR 616 / 285 Taxman 400 (Guj.)(HC)S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Draft assessment order-Violation of principle of natural justice-Failure to issue notice-Order not valid [S.143(3), 144(2), Art. 226]
Gandhi Realty (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 441 ITR 316 / 214 DTR 283 (Guj.) (HC)S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Procedure prescribed not followed-Cash credits-Firm-Partner-Source of the investors of capital and amount received need not be established-Matter remanded. [S.68,69, 143 (3), 144B(9), Art. 226]
Darshan Enterprise v. ACIT (2022) 441 ITR 473 / 209 DTR 417 / 324 CTR 469 / 286 Taxman 75 (Guj.)(HC)