This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 153 : Assessment – Reassessment – Limitation – Tribunal remanding back for denovo adjudication – Notice beyond limitation period was quashed – Directed to refund the amount in excess of admitted liability along with interest [ S. 92CA(3A), s153 (4), 240 , 244 , 254(1), Art , 226 ]
TE Connectivity India Pvt Ltd v. DCIT ( 2022) 138 taxmann.com 148 /The Chamber’s Journal –April – P. 96 ( Karn)(HC)
S. 148A: Reassessment – Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice – Assessment order not passed – Statement of entry provider – Case does not fall under the exceptional grounds – Alternative remedy – Writ petition was dismissed [S. 148 , Art, 226 ]
Gulmuhar Silk Pvt Ltd v. ITO ( 2022) 212 DTR 345/ 326 CTR 244 ( Delhi)( HC)
S. 148 : Reassessment –Notice -Name struck off – Notice served on person not authorised by the assessee is not valid service – Assessment order was quashed – Section 292BB is prospective and applicable from AY. 2009 -10 onwards [ S.147, 282, Code of Civil Procedure 1908, Order, 5 ]
PCIT v. Mahla Real Estate ( P) Ltd (2022) The Chamber’s Journal -March – P. 109 ( Raj)( HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment – Change of opinion –Depreciation on intangible – Acquisition of Brands – Information from Investigation Wing – All materials were before the Assessing Officer during original assessment proceedings – Once the query raised was subject to the consideration of the AO , while completing the assessment , it is not necessary that the assessment order should contain reference and / or discussion to disclose his satisfaction in respect of each of query raised – Reassessment based on same records quashed on the ground of change of opinion [ S. 32 , 92CA(4), 148 , Art , 226 ]
Prethi Kitchen Appliances Pvt Ltd v .ACIT ( 2022) ) The Chamber’s Journal – February -P. 180 ( Bom)( HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment – Borrowed cash loan – Violation of section 269SS – Reason did not mention that income that escaped assessment – Mechanical approval -Reassessment notice is invalid and quashed [ S. 148 , 151, 269SS, 269T , Art , 226 ]
Sanjeev Amritlal Chheda v. ITO (2022) The Chamber’s Journal – February -P. 176 ( Bom)( HC)
S. 127 : Power to transfer cases – Transfer for effective and co -ordinated investigation and assessment – Transfer valid [ S. 132, Art . 226 ]
Kamlesh Rajnikant Shah v .PCIT (2022) (2022) 287 Taxman 504 (Guj.)(HC)
S. 12AA : Procedure for registration –Trust or institution- Third party statement – Failure to record how the activities of the Trust is not genuine – Order of cancellation of registration is not valid [ S. 12A, 12AA(3), 133A ]
CIT(E) v. Sanskriti Sagar (2022) The Chamber’s Journal – June -P. 77 ( Cal)( HC)
S.54F : Capital gains- Investment in a residential house – Non -Resident – Transfer of tenancy rights – Invested in residential flat in proposed building – AO was indeed in error in adopting a hyper-pedantic approach and holding that there was a fresh claim for exemption under section 54F of the Act -Entitle for exemption [ S.45, 54, ]
ITO v. Armine Hamied Khan (2022) 197 ITD 110 ( Mum)( Trib) www.itatonline .org
S. 149 : Reassessment – Time limit for notice – Board’s circular dated 11-5 -2022 ( 2022) 444 ITR 43( St) – Income escaping assessment to tax is less than Rs .50 lakhs – Reopening is not valid [ S.148, 148A Art , 226 ]
Ajay Bhandari v. UOI (2022) 446 ITR 699 / 288 Taxman 217/ 218 DTR 201/ 328 CTR 884 ( All)(HC)
S. 148A: Reassessment – Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice – Show cause notice and order are based on distinct and separate grounds- Information referred in show cause notice was not provided – Notice was quashed – Respondents were given liberty to furnish additional material in support of the alleged allegation made in show cause notice .[ S. 148, 148A(d) , Art , 226 ]
Best Buildwell Pvt Ltd v .ITO ( 2022) ) 288 Taxman 670 / BCAJ – September – P. 57 ( Delhi)( HC)