S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible – Deduction at source – Advertisement expenditure- Late fee and service tax – Disallowance is not valid
Prithvi Outdoor Publicity LLP v . CIT(A) ( 2022) BCAJ -September – P. 49 ( Ahd)( Trib)S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible – Deduction at source – Advertisement expenditure- Late fee and service tax – Disallowance is not valid
Prithvi Outdoor Publicity LLP v . CIT(A) ( 2022) BCAJ -September – P. 49 ( Ahd)( Trib)S. 12AB: Procedure for fresh registration – Commissioner granted the Registration subject to various conditions – Conditions cannot be imposed as the scheme of the Act does not visualise the conditions imposed by the Commissioner [ S. 2(15)( 11), 12, 12A , 80G 115TD, 115 TF , Foreign Contribution Regulation Act 2010 (FCRA) ]
]
S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty – Concealment -Inaccurate particulars – Mistake committed in calculation – Non -Resident – Peak amount offered on account of funds lying in the bank accounts held by JWL and SF with HSBC Bank Zurich -Revised return filed before issue of notice u/s 148 of the Act which was accepted without making addition – Deletion of penalty is held to be valid . [ S. 139, 143(3) , 148 ]
CIT(IT) v. Ashutosh Bhatt (2022) 287 Taxman 436 ( Bom)(HC)S. 264 :Commissioner – Revision of other orders – Private company – Liability of directors -Non speaking order without any reasons – AO wishes to rely on any judgements or order passed by any Court or Tribunal he should provide a copy thereof to the petitioner and allow an opportunity to deal with those judgements or distinguish those judgements and the submission of the assessee shall also be dealt with in the order -Order of Assessing officer is set aside . [ S. 179, Art , 226 ]
Bhavesh Mohan Lakhwani v .PCIT ( 2022) BCAJ – March – P. 49 (Bom)(HC)S. 144B : Faceless Assessment – Principle of natural justice – Opportunity of hearing- Personal hearing through video conference was denied – Matter remanded [ Art , 226 ]
LKP Securities Ltd v . Dy.CIT( 2022) BCAJ -August -P 77 )( Bom)(HC))S. 80IB(10) : Housing projects- Commencement of development of residential project – Owner or developer -Date of approval -Ownership of land – Joint venture – The project for which permission was granted on 24 th July 2002 was not the same as that for which the ID lapsed in 2001- Eligible to deduction .
CIT v. Abode Builders (2022) (2022) 448 ITR 262 / 213 DTR 251/ 326 CTR 262 ( Bom)(HC)S. 68 : Cash credits – Enquiry was conducted by the Assessing Officer -Transaction was through banking channel- Creditworthiness established – Statement of lenders recorded – Explanation was not found to be false – Deletion of addition is affirmed [ S. 131(1)(d) ]
PCIT v. Aarhat Investments ( 2022) BCAJ- May – P. 47 ( Bom)(HC)S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue – Penalty for under -reporting and misreporting of income – Revision proceedings held to be not valid merely for non initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 270A of the Act .[ S. 270A]
Coimbatore Vaiyapuri Maathesh v.ITO( 2022) BCAJ – August – P. 85 ( Chennai )( Trib)S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue –
Donation – CSR expenses – Donation to trust – Restriction under Explanation 2 section 37 does not apply – Revision is not valid .[ S. 37(1),80G ]
S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal – Appeal – Appeal filed by a company , struck off by the time it was taken up for hearing – Appeal is maintainable [ S. 68, 179 , Companies Act, 2013 , 248(1), 248(5) 248(6) ]
Dwarka Portfolio Pvt Ltd v .ACIT ( 2022)) 99 ITR 620 / 195 ITD 491 /BCAJ- August -P. 67 ( Delhi ) ( Trib)