S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Addition cannot be made only on the basis of statement of partner in the absence of any other material. [S. 131(IA)]
Kohinoor Craft v. ACIT, (2021) 213 TTJ 70 (UO) / (2022) 192 ITD 584 (SMC) (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Addition cannot be made only on the basis of statement of partner in the absence of any other material. [S. 131(IA)]
Kohinoor Craft v. ACIT, (2021) 213 TTJ 70 (UO) / (2022) 192 ITD 584 (SMC) (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 69A : Unexplained money-Explanation provide by the Assessee-particular entries were recorded by the AO-proper explanation provided for the same-Addition made by the AO not sustained.
Jagmohan Kaur Bajwa (Smt.) L/H of Late Jaskiran Singh Bajwa v. ITO, (2021) 213 TTJ 558 / 206 DTR 1 / (2022) 193 ITD 46/97 ITR 149 (Chd.) (Trib.)S. 69A : Unexplained money-Cash deposited in bank account-Received from tuition fees-Explanation not accepted-Working of peak credit-Matter remanded-Reassessment-Approval is held to be valid-Reassessment is up held. [S. 147, 148, 151]
Shyam Gidwani v. ITO (2021) 214 TTJ 862 / 208 DTR 233 / 63 CCH 155 (Jaipur)(Trib.)S. 69A : Unexplained money-Unexplained jewellery-Family members explained the source of investment-Addition is held to be not justified-Renovation of house property out of withdrawals from bank-Addition is not valid. [S. 69C, 132, 153A]
Anila Rasiklal Mehta (Mrs.) v. Dy. CIT (2021) 214 TTJ 849 / 63 CCH 491 (Mum.)(Trib.)S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Failure to furnish explanation for source of funds for purchase of car-Addition is justified-Income surrendered not disclosed in the return-Addition as unexplained investment is proper-Addition on account of foreign tour expenses of minor and assessee is held to be justified. [S. 69C, 132(4)]
Gautam Kumar v. ACIT (2021) 91 ITR 28 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Failure to explain the source of investment-Addition is confirmed-Delay in filing of appeal is condoned. [S. 254(1)]
Parminder Kaur v. ITO (2021)91 ITR 216 (Amritsar)(Trib.)S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Acquisition and sale without consideration-Transferred by uncle is retransferred-Addition is held to be not justified.
Baljit Singh Bachal v. ITO (2021) 207 DTR 121 / 91 ITR 100 / 214 TTJ 220 (Chd.)(Trib.)S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Addition at rate of 4% assuming saving bank account interest rate earned on bank balances with HSBC, Geneva-Illogical to compute interest rate prevailing in India as there was no documentary evidence to support presumption of AO-Same amount taxed twice in two assessment years amounts to double taxation deleted addition. [S. 153A]
ACIT v. Krishan Lal Madhok (2021) 213 TTJ 734 / 206 DTR 123 (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Bank deposit-Non-Resident-Two bank accounts in HSBC Geneva-Non-Resident-Income earned in Abu Dhabi and savings made in UAE as a non-resident-Addition cannot be made merely on the basis of information received from DIT. [S. 147]
Dy. CIT v. Ganpat Singhvi (2021) 214 TTJ 137 / 91 ITR 420 / (2022) 192 ITD 567 / 207 DTR 181 (Mum.)(Trib.)S. 68 : Cash credit-Income from undisclosed sources-Bank statement of assessee showing loan from non-resident individual-During appeal proceedings filing confirmation of lender with his passport, copy of bank account and affidavit of seller-Addition not justified.[S. 69]
Nitin Gupta v. ITO (2021) 91 ITR 47 (SN) / 214 TTJ 247 (SMC) (Delhi)(Trib.)