S. 143(3) : Assessment-Deduction of tax at source-Mismatch-Income declared no deduction of tax at source claimed-Deletion of addition is proper. [Form No. 26AS]
ACIT v. Silver Jubilee Motors Ltd. (2022) 94 ITR 19 (Trib.) (SN) (Pune)(Trib.)S. 143(3) : Assessment-Deduction of tax at source-Mismatch-Income declared no deduction of tax at source claimed-Deletion of addition is proper. [Form No. 26AS]
ACIT v. Silver Jubilee Motors Ltd. (2022) 94 ITR 19 (Trib.) (SN) (Pune)(Trib.)S. 143(3) : Assessment-Limited scrutiny-Disallowance of deduction not subject matter of limited scrutiny-Addition deleted-Interest expenditure-No loan taken during year-Interest disallowance is not valid when no disallowance was made in earlier years or subsequent years. [S. 57]
Dharam Bhushan Jain v. ACIT (2022) 94 ITR 1 (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 143(3) : Assessment-Search-Merely because a hard disk belonging to assessee was found and seized from business premises of assessee, gives no ground for addition to the AO, when no incriminating or corroborative documents have emanated therefrom or otherwise. [S. 132, 292]
ACIT v. Lepro Herbals (P.) Ltd. (2022) 94 ITR 225 /216 TTJ 682 / 215 DTR 233 (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 143(2) : Assessment-Notice-Failure to issue notice-Reassessment is bad in law-Monetary limit-Information from Sales tax department falls with in the exception-Appeal is maintainable. [S. 147, 148, 268A]
ITO v. Manjil Dineshkumar Shah (2022) 94 ITR 68 (SN) (Ahd.) (Trib.)S. 143(2) : Assessment-Notice-Non-issuance of notice u/s 143(2) is a jurisdictional defect and cannot be cured by section 292BB-Reassessment is held to be bad in law. [S. 147, 148, 292BB]
Sapankumar U. Jain v. ITO (2022) 94 ITR 216 (Mum.)(Trib.)S. 92CA : Reference to transfer pricing officer-Additional ground-Limitation-Time-limit specified under section 92CA(3A) is mandatory-TPO is bound by time-limit for passing of order under section 92CA (3), failing which the order is invalid. [S. 92CA(3A), 254(1)]
Swiss Re Global Business Solution India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2022) 94 ITR 196 (Bang.)(Trib.)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Provision of software consultancy services-Adjustment to be restricted to amount retained by associated enterprise. [S. 92CA(3)]
Trigyn Technologies Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 94 ITR 71 (SN) (Mum.) (Trib.)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparables-Functionally dissimilar companies cannot be taken as comparable–Government owned company taken as comparable on ground of functional similarity-Low turnover for particular year cannot be ground to exclude company functionally similar-Matter remanded.
Honda R and D (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 94 ITR 15 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Business support services-No finding that services not rendered-Directed to benchmark transactions adopting Transactional Net Margin Method-Held to be proper.
Endemol India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 94 ITR 40 (SN) (Mum.)(Trib.)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Reclassifying from a marketing and sales service provider to technical and business service provider-Held to be not proper-Matter remanded [S.92CA]
Parametric Technology (India) P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 94 ITR 398 (Bang.)(Trib.)