This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
Interpretation of taxing statutes–Literal construction-Exemption provisions-Assessee Must Strictly Comply With Conditions. [[S. 10B(5), 10B(8), 72, 80, 139(1), 139(3), 139(5)]
PCIT v. Wipro Ltd. (2022) 446 ITR 1 / 216 DTR 1 / 327 CTR 381/ 288 Taxman 491 / 140 taxmann.com 223 (SC)
S. 279 : Offences and prosecutions-Sanction-Chief Commissioner-Commissioner-Wilful attempt to evade tax-Application for compounding of offences-Limitation-Show-cause notice issued for rejection of compounding of offences on ground of Bar of limitation relying on Circular issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular cannot override statutory provision-Authority to consider application in accordance with law. [S. 276C, 277, 278B, 279(2), Art. 226]
G. P. Engineering Works Kachhwa v. UOI (2022) 446 ITR 563 // ( 2023) 332 CTR 104/ 224 DTR 257/ ( 2023) 332 CTR 104/ 224 DTR 257(All.) (HC)
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Issue not referred in the notice of revision-Order of revision on such issue-Not valid. [S. 40A(2)(b)]
PCIT v. Universal Music India Pvt. Ltd. (2022)446 ITR 287 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Formula not applicable to AY. 2002-03-Revision is held to be not valid. [S. 14A,R. 8D]
CIT v. Accel Limited (2022) 446 ITR 47 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Valuation of stock-Valuation adopted by Revenue valid-No question of law. [S. 145]
Goa Carbon Ltd. v. JCIT (2022) 446 ITR 590 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Interest on borrowed capital-Travel expenses-Question of fact-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S. 36(1)(iii), 37(1)]
PCIT v. Utech Developers Ltd. (2022) 446 ITR 198/ 289 Taxman 259 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Jurisdiction-Registered Office at Bangalore-Appeal filed at Delhi is not maintainable-Liberty is given to file appeal having jurisdiction.
PCIT v. Phoenix Lamps Ltd. (No. 1) (2022) 446 ITR 415 (Delhi)(HC) PCIT v. Phoenix Lamps Ltd. (No. 2) (2022) 446 ITR 417 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 245C : Settlement Commission-Settlement of cases-Full disclosure, co-operation with Commission-Disclosing Foreign Bank Accounts and extent of money available in them and filing affidavit narrating transfer of funds-Offer to be treated as true and full disclosure-Not to be treated as non-Co-operation-Mandatory personal hearing was not granted-Violation of principle of natural justice-Matter remanded to Settlement Commission. [S. 245D, 245D(3), Income-Tax Settlement Commission (Procedure) Rules, 1997, R. 6, 8, 9,9A, 15 Art. 226]
Kandathil M. Mammen v. ITSC (2022) 446 ITR 595/ 218 DTR 65 /329 CTR 839 / 289 Taxman 347 (Mad.)(HC) Arun Mammen v. ITSC (2022) 446 ITR 595/ 218 DTR 65 /329 CTR 839 / 289 Taxman 347 (Mad.)(HC) Editorial : Decision of the single judge in Arun Mamen v. ITSC (2021) 438 ITR 378 (Mad)(HC) reversed.
S. 226 : Collection and recovery-Modes of recovery-Pendency of appeal before CIT(A)-Freezing of bank accounts and demand recovered-Directed to file application to expedite hearing before National Faceless Appeal Centre. [S. 246A, Art. 226]
Priti Nanda v. CIT (Appeals) (2022) 446 ITR 513 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Stay of demand-Commissioner (Appeals) being Quasi-Judicial Authority is not bound by administrative circulars issued by Central Board Of Direct Taxes-Deposit of 20% of the outstanding demand is not mandatory-CIT(A) has to apply is mind independently-Matter remanded. [S. 220(6), 246A, Art. 226]
APR Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (Appeals) (2022) 446 ITR 275 / 214 DTR 313/ 327 CTR 113(Telangana)(HC)