This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 35 : Scientific research expenditure-Expenditure towards clinical trials for availing of facility of its subsidiary abroad and at facility not approved by prescribed authority-Weighted deduction not allowable. [S. 35(2AB)]
PCIT v. Apollo Tyres Ltd. (No. 2) (2022) 447 ITR 403 (Ker.)(HC) PCIT v. Apollo Tyres Ltd. (No. 3) (2022) 447 ITR 431 (Ker.)(HC) Editorial: SLP of assessee dismissed, Apollo Tyres Ltd. v. PCIT (2022) 447 ITR 8 (St)(SC)
S. 35 : Scientific research expenditure-Weighted deduction-Expenditure incurred on in-house research and development facility-Entitled to weighted deduction. [S. 35(2AB)]
PCIT v. Apollo Tyres Ltd. (No. 1) (2022)447 ITR 397 (Ker.)(HC)
S. 32 : Depreciation-Additional depreciation-Entitled to balance of additional depreciation not availed of in earlier year in subsequent assessment year. [S. 32(1)(iia)]
CIT v. Apollo Tyres Ltd. (No. 3) (2022) 447 ITR 393 (Ker.)(HC)
S. 32 : Depreciation-Assets not available for physical verification-Cannot be the ground for disallowance of depreciation.
PCIT v. Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. (2022) 447 ITR 186 (Raj.)(HC)
S. 28(i) : Business loss-Guarantor-Allowable as business loss. [S. 37 (1)]
CIT v. Apollo Tyres Ltd. (No. 3) (2022) 447 ITR 393 (Ker.)(HC)
S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Without giving finding how much administrative expenditure incurred to earn exempt income-Disallowance not Justified. [R.8D]
CIT v. UTI Bank Ltd. (2022)447 ITR 662 / 219 DTR 528 / 329 CTR 597 / 289 Taxman 238 (SC) Editorial : Decision in CIT v. UTI Bank Ltd (2014) 2 ITR-OL 366 (Guj)(HC), affirmed.
S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Rule of consistency-No change in activities-Supervision or monitoring of activities by donor not sufficient to hold that any profit motive is involved-Grant of exemption is valid. [S. 2(15)]
CIT v. Professional Assistance for Development Action (2022) 447 ITR 103 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Object improve public transport system and to assist its members-Charitable object entitle to exemption-Order of Tribunal is affirmed. [S. 2(15), 10(23C)(vi), 12A, 260A]
CIT(E) v. Association of State Road Transport Undertakings (2022) 447 ITR 95 (Delhi)(HC)