This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 44AD : Presumptive taxation-Supplier of security guards-Disclosure of profits at 8 Percent of gross receipts-Failure to pay advance tax-Directed to pay at 10 percent. [S. 44AA, 44AB, 234C]
Shanti Ranjan Biswas v. ITO (2021) 92 ITR 328 (Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 40A(3) : Expenses or payments not deductible-Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits-Aggregate of payments in a day did not exceed Rs.20000-No disallowance can be made.
Viney Corporation Ltd. v. ACIT (2021)92 ITR 59 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Fines and penalties-Interest on arrears of Service tax-Not penal in nature-Allowable as deduction.
Dy. CIT v. PLR Projects Pvt Ltd (2021) 92 ITR 23 (SN) (Hyd.)(Trib.)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Consultancy charges paid to technical persons-Expenditure cannot be disallowed on estimate basis.
Lauren Software Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2021) 92 ITR 47 (SN) (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Media business selling advertisement airtime on its Channel-Discount allowed-Allowable as revenue expenditure-Unpaid leave and encashment-Directed the Assessing Officer to verify actual payment. [S. 43B(f)]
JCIT v. T. V. Today Network Ltd. (2021) 92 ITR 53 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib.)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Manufacturer Of Automotive Switchgears-Expenditure on development of designs and tools-Capital expenditure.
Dy.CIT v. Sutham Electric Ltd. (2021) 92 ITR 35 (SN) (Pune)(Trib.)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Periodic maintenance on road very five years-Matching concept-Provision for periodic maintenance-Allowable as revenue expenditure-Provision not includible in book profit. [S. 115J]
Dy.CIT v. Gorakhpur Infrastructure Co. Ltd. (2021) 92 ITR 42 (SN) (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Mining business-Stopped by order of Supreme Court-Guarantee payments for resuming mining activity-Expenditure on discharging social responsibility-Contributions to flood relief work-Legal fees to Federation of Mining Industries-Allowable as revenue expenditure.
Zeenath Transport Company v. ACIT (2021) 92 ITR 460 (Bang.) (Trib.)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Lease hold land-Amount spent on construction-Allowable as revenue expenditure-Explanation to section 32(1). [S. 32]
Dy.CIT v. Eastman Exports Global Clothing Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 92 ITR 343 (Chennai)(Trib.)