This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 254(2) : Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Order of the Tribunal, accepting the withdrawal of the appeals, passed on incorrect facts which were mistakenly represented and admitted by assessee’s counsel has resulted in an error in such Order and is liable for rectification. [S. 263]
Motia Construction Ltd. v. DCIT (2021) 212 TTJ 398 / 90 ITR 103/ 203 DTR 365 (Chd.)(Trib.)
S. 254(1) : Appeal to Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Request for adjournments of six months on account of COVID-19 pandemic was rejected-Lat opportunity was granted.
DCIT v. Saroj Kumar Poddar (2021) 212 TTJ 250 / 90 ITR 223 / 203 DTR 81 (Kol.) (Trib.)
S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal-Order of CIT(A) quashing the reassessment proceedings in the absence of valid sanction under section 151 not challenged before Appellate Tribunal-Appeal not maintainable on merits of the case. [S. 143(2), 147, 151, 253(2)]
ACIT v. SG Portfolio (P) Ltd. (2021) 211 TTJ 970 / 201 DTR 393 (Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Powers-Additional evidence-Where the AO has not been provided adequate opportunity to go through the additional evidence, the admission and examination of the additional evidence by Ld. CIT(A) is completely inadequate. [S. 254(1), Rule 46A of Income-Tax Rules, 1962]
DCIT v. Pipal Tree Ventures Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 210 TTJ 258 (Mum.) (Trib.)
S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Powers-Order of reassessment was quashed for want of valid prior sanction of PCIT-Direction to issue fresh reassessment notice was quashed and set aside. [S. 147, 151, 250]
Munish Chander Khurana v. ITO (2021) 89 ITR 4 (SMC) (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Powers-Additional evidence-Fair market value-Directed to admit additional evidence corrigendum issued by Valuer to valuation report. [S. 56(2)(viib), 254(1)]
I Brands Beverages Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 89 ITR 49 (SN) (Bang.)(Trib.)
S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Procedure-Ex Parte Order-Dismissal of appeal in Limine without speaking order-Order set aside and remanded for disposal afresh. [S. 250(6)]
Monika (Smt.) v. ITO (2021) 89 ITR 54 (SN) (Chd.)(Trib.) Urmila Devi (Smt.) v. ITO (2021)89 ITR 54 (SN) (Chd.)(Trib.)
S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Procedure-E. Filing of appeal with effect from 1-3-2016-Dismissal of appeal-Matter remanded to CIT (A) for providing an opportunity to file appeal in electronic mode and decide in accordance with law-Appeal decided ex-parte was also set aside. [S. 254(1), R. 45]
Metalysst Forgings Ltd v. ACIT (2021) 89 ITR 12 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 240 : Refund-Refund due to the assessee as per the order passed by settlement commission-AO is bound to issue refund. [S. 199, 245C, 245D(4)]
ACIT v. North American Coal Corporation India Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 211 TTJ 907/ 201 DTR 241 (SMC) (Pune)(Trib.)
S. 199 : Deduction at source-Credit for tax deducted-Buyer deducting tax on entire sum paid-Claimed credit for entire credit for tax deducted-Only part of income was shown as receipt for the year-Matter remanded.
Concrete Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2021)89 ITR 14 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)