This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Sanction-Income escaped less than Rs. 50 lakhs-Notice issued after three years-Income from other sources-Notice is void ab-initio. [S. 56(2)(vii)(b), 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), 149, 151]

Manish Jagdish Joshi v. CIT (2024) 208 ITD 432 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Initiated as per the decision of UOI v. Ashish Agarwal (2022) 286 Taxman 183/ 444 ITR 1 (SC)-Assessing Officer treated initial section 148 notice as section 148A(b) notice as per Supreme Court decision-Reassessment order was passed without issuing fresh section 148 notice-Order is without jurisdiction and void ab initio. [S. 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d)]

Ranjit Singh v. ITO (2024) 208 ITD 19 (Amritsar) (Trib.)

S. 147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Cash credits-Cash deposited in to bank-AIR information-Non application of mind by the Assessing Officer-Reasons recorded by Assessing Officer for reopening assessment were based on factual errors, reopening notice was void ab initio. Reassessment order is quashed. [S. 68, 143(3), 148]

Sukhvir Singh. v. ITO (2024) 208 ITD 97 (Amritsar) (Trib.)

S. 145 : Method of accounting-Whole sale food items-Estimation of net profit-Matter is remanded back to Assessing Officer to adjudicate afresh.

Ashok Anand Shetty v. ITO (2024) 208 ITD 714 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 143(1) : Assessment-Intimation-Prima facie adjustment-Excise duty-Adjustment made by Assessing Officer under section 143(1) by including excise duty in turnover is not sustainable.[S.143(1)(a), 145A]

Kluber Lubrication India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2024) 208 ITD 470/231 TTJ 329/ 241 DTR 113 (Bang) (Trib.)

S. 115-O : Domestic companies-Tax on distributed profits-Income-Deemed to accrue or arise in India-Dividend-DTAA does not get triggered when a domestic company pays DDT under section 115-O-Order of the AO rejecting the claim of refund of excess DDT is affirmed.-DTAA-India-Italy [S.9(1)(iv), Art. 11]

Piaggio Vehicles (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2024) 208 ITD 299 (Pune) (Trib.)

S. 115BAC : Tax on income of individuals and Hindu Undivided Family-Old scheme-New tax scheme and filed form 10-IE while filing revised return, requirement of filing Form 10-IE was directory in nature and not mandatory and it was sufficient compliance if said form was before Assessing Officer at time of assessment.[S.139(1), 143(1) R. 21AG(1), Form No 10-IE]

Harbans Singh v. AO, CPC (2024) 208 ITD 151 (Amritsar) (Trib.)

S. 80G : Donation-Rejection of application-Pendency of fresh application-Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. [S.80G(5)(viii), Form No 10AB]

Gedee Medical Foundation. v. CIT (2024) 208 ITD 344 (Chennai) (Trib.)

S. 90 :Double taxation relief-Investment fund-Capital gains-Shares, units, transfer of-Conduit entity without any economic substance-Not justified in denying benefits under article 13 on long term capital gains-DTAA-India-Mauritius [S.9(1)(i)), 90(2) Art. 13(4)]

India Property (Mauritius) Co v. ACIT (2024) 114 ITR 1 / 208 ITD 129 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 80IC : Special category States-Partnership firm to company-Change in status of company in terms of its composition does not brings into action provisions of section 80IC(4)(ii)-Entitle to deduction. [S 80IC(2)(a)(ii), 80IC(4)(ii)]

Madura Biotech (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2024) 208 ITD 699 (Delhi) (Trib.)