This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Arm’s length price-Adjustment of transfer pricing-Disallowance of expenditure-Penalty not leviable.
ACIT v. IKEA Trading (India) P. Ltd. (2021) 87 ITR 12 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib.)
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Substantial expansion-Initial assessment year-Order not erroneous-Revision was held to be not valid. [S. 80IC]
Rasna Pvt. Ltd. v. PCIT (2021) 87 ITR 58 (SN) (Ahd.)(Trib.)
S. 154 : Rectification of mistake-Intimation-Not reporting income in proper columns-Double taxation-Income cannot be taxed twice-Matter remanded-DTAA-India-United Kingdom. [S. 143(1), Art. 13]
Building Design Partnership Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2021) 87 ITR 78 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-On money-Settlement Commission-Firm admitting that the surplus belong to the firm and related parties-Amount credited to partner’s account-Deletion of addition is held to be justified. [S. 132]
Dy.CIT v. Jugal Kishore Garg (Derewala) (2021)87 ITR 624 (Jaipur)(Trib.)
S. 147 : Reassessment-No fresh tangible material-Reassessment not valid. [S. 143(1), 148]
Samrat Plywood Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 87 ITR 102 / 203 DTR 421 (Chd.)(Trib.)
S. 147 : Reassessment-Compensation received-No discussion in the assessment order-Reassessment was up held. [S. 28(va), 148]
Sai Mirra Innopharm P. Ltd. v. ITO (2021) 87 ITR 235 (Chennai)(Trib.)
S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Information from Investigation Wing-Client code modification-Mistake by share broker-Reassessment is held to be not valid. [S. 148]
Chintan Jaswantbhai Shah v. ITO (2021) 87 ITR 228 (Ahd.)(Trib.)
S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Unexplained investment-Beneficiaries of Trusts-Discretionary trust-Account with bank in Liechtenstein-Notice barred by limitation-Addition was not valid-1/5 share in the trust neither accrued nor arisen-Additional ground was admitted. [S. 69, 143(3), 148, 151(2)]
Manoj Kumar Dhupelia v. Dy.CIT (2021) 87 ITR 528 (Kol.)(Trib.) Rupal Dhupelia (Smt.) v. Dy. CIT (2021) 87 ITR 528 (Kol.)(Trib.) Editorial : Order in Mohan Ambrish and Ms Bhavya Manoj Dhupalia v. Dy.CIT (2014) 54 taxmann.com 146 (Mum.)(Trib.), distinguished.
S. 145 : Method of accounting-Real estate business-Project competition method-Advance from customers-Estimate at 10 percent of advance received during the year is proper-Advance carried over from earlier years no addition can be made. [S. 28(1), 145(3)]
Srabani Constructions Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 87 ITR 7 (SN) (Cuttack)(Trib.)