This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 145 : Method of accounting-Provision for software expenses-Allowable as deduction. [S. 37(1)]

Infosys Bpm Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 87 ITR 193 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Undisclosed income-Cash in hand as at close of preceding year accepted in assessment-Sufficient to cover shortfall in sum returned-Addition cannot be made. [S. 132]

Daya Properties and Finance v. ACIT (2021) 87 ITR 17 (SN) (Indore) (Trib.)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Undisclosed income-Bogus purchases-Sales accepted-Statement in the course of search-Neither the statement was furnished nor an opportunity of cross examination was provided-Addition is held to be not justified. [S. 131, 133(6)]

ACIT v. Jain Jewellery (2021) 87 ITR 43 (SN.) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 142(2A) : Inquiry before assessment-Special audit-Time limit-Assessment completed within two months from date of special Audit report-Held to be within limitation period. [S. 142(2C), 153]

Dwarka Prasad Tayal v. ITO (2021)87 ITR 675 (Indore)(Trib.)

S. 115JB : Book profit-Capital or revenue-Receipt of unutilised contribution from welfare trust-Not liable to tax while computing Book Profit. [S. 2(24), 40A(11)]

Batliboi Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2021) 87 ITR 401 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparable-Company whose audited financial data for previous year available in public domain not to be discarded merely because it has different financial year-Expenses on travel, boarding and lodging, etc. of its employees during outstation visits-Assessee should have marked up expenses by a profit-margin before making recoveries-Weighted average period of realization with respect to all invoices was only 20.52 days-Matter remanded.

Dunnhumby It Services India P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 87 ITR 66 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Net margin method-Adjustments to be restricted to international transactions and not to be applied to entire segment of manufacturing activity-Entitled to benefit of tolerance range of +5 Per Cent. [S. 92CA]

Add.CIT v. Bunge India Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 87 ITR 34 (SN) (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 92B : Transfer pricing-Associated enterprise-Performance guarantee-International Transactions-Transfer Pricing Adjustment-Performance Guarantee-No risk was involved-Adjustment is not justified-Corporate Guarantee to bank on behalf of Associated enterprise-Directed to recompute arm’s length price of guarantee commission at 0.20 Per Cent.

Dy. CIT v. KEC International Ltd. (2021) 87 ITR 587 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 92B : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Advertisement, marketing and sales promotion expenses. [S. 92CA]

Amadeus India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 87 ITR 371 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 92B : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Advertisement, marketing and sales promotion expenses-Incidental benefit to foreign associated enterprise not to be concluded as brand building exercise. [S.92C]

Xerox India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 87 ITR 209 (Delhi)(Trib.)