S. 143(3) : Assessment-Amalgamation-Order of assessment framed in name of non-existent entity after it ceases to be a subsisting entity-Ab initio void.
Infosys Bpm Ltd. v. JCIT (2021) 91 ITR 12 (SN) (Bang.)(Trib.)S. 143(3) : Assessment-Amalgamation-Order of assessment framed in name of non-existent entity after it ceases to be a subsisting entity-Ab initio void.
Infosys Bpm Ltd. v. JCIT (2021) 91 ITR 12 (SN) (Bang.)(Trib.)S. 143(3) : Assessment-Income from undisclosed sources-Refund of tax deducted by mistake-Deletion of addition is justified [S. 69]
ITO v. Logistic Buildtech P. Ltd. (2021) 91 ITR 14 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 143(3) : Assessment-Income from undisclosed sources-estimate of income-Suppression of both purchases and sales-Gross profit alone to be assessed and not entire suppressed sales.-Prior period expenses-Disallowance is justified-Sundry creditors-Matter remanded. [S. 37(1), 69]
APS Steel Pvt. Ltd v. ITO (2021) 91 ITR 25 (SN) (Bang.)(Trib.)S. 143(2) : Assessment-Notice was issued by ITO Belgaum-Actual Assessing Officer id from Bellary-Notice was issue without jurisdiction-Order was quashed. [S. 10(10D), 127, 143(3)]
Dy. CIT v. Hothur Mohamed Iqbal (2021) 214 TTJ 996 / (2022) 192 ITD 64 (Bang.)(Trib.)S. 143(1)(a) : Assessment-Intimation-Prima facie adjustments-Capital gains-Exemption denied-No intimation before making adjustments-Adjustments is not sustainable. [S. 11(1A), 11(2)]
Ceylon Pentecostal Mission v. ACIT (2021) 214 TTJ 651 / 91 ITR 54 (SN) / 207 DTR 249 (Chenai)(Trib.)S. 124 : Jurisdiction of Assessing Officer-Objection to jurisdiction cannot be challenged after completion of Assessment-Assessee submitting to jurisdiction of Assessing Officer by filing return-issue not raised in assessment proceedings-Assessment valid.[S. 124(3)]
Prithvi Raj Singh v. ITO (2021) 91 ITR 164 (Jaipur)(Trib.)S. 115JB : Book profit-Provision for expenses-Ascertained liability-Cannot be added back. [S. 37(1)]
Barclays Shared Services (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 202 DTR 185/(2022) 216 TTJ 228 (Pune)(Trib.)S. 115JB : Book profit-Relief for a period of 8 years-Not entitle to relief from claiming further relief after its net worth turned positive during said scheme period. [S. 115JB(2), Expln. 1 (vii), Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions, Act, 1985, S. 17(1), 18(12)]
Windsor Machines Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 199 DTR 79 (Mum.)(Trib.)S. 115JB : Book profit-Fertiliser subsidy received treated as capital receipt and not chargeable to tax, it had to be excluded from computing book profit. [S. 4]
ACIT v. Shree Pushkar Chemicals & Fertilisers Ltd. (2021) 213 TTJ 273 / (2022) 192 ITD 618 (Mum.)(Trib.)S. 115A : Foreign companies-Tax-Dividends-Royalty-Technical services fees-Rate of tax-Matter remanded-DTAA-India-USA. [S. 115A(b), Art. 12]
Gemological Institute International Inc. v. CIT (2021) 214 TTJ 393 / (2022) 192 ITD 83 / 211 DTR 139 (Mum.)(Trib.)