This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comprables-Exclusion of company from the comparable is set aside-Amount of export incentives is liable to be considered as part of operating revenue-Transfer pricing adjustment is to be restricted only to the extent of international transactions-TPO is directed to grant working capital adjustment as per the methodology suggested by DRP. [S. 144C]
Tasty Bitte Eatables Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 214 TTJ 643 (Pune)(Trib.)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-CUP method is not the most appropriate method in the facts of the case-Assessing Officer is directed to determine ALP under the TNMM but restricting the amount of adjustment only to the International Transactions. [R. 10B]
Mubea Automotive Components India (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 214 TTJ 1047 / 63 CCH 501 / 208 DTR 217 (Pune)(Trib.)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Cup method-Rate at which the distribution company sells the electricity to the customers has to be adopted the transactions relating to transfer of electricity to other units-Purchase made from AE are at arm’s length price and non AE transactions are considered under CUP method.
Jayant Agro Organics Ltd. v. Addl. CIT 214 TTJ 368 (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Royalty-Net margin is higher than the margin of the comparables, addition was deleted-It is not obligatory for the assessee to demonstrate as to whether or not the international transaction has resulted into economic benefit. [S. 92BF(ii)]
Dow Agrosciences India (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 214 TTJ 1064 / 126 taxmann.com 240/(2022) 214 DTR 291 (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 90 : Double taxation relief-Tax credit-Assessing Officer will examine the provisions of the respective tax treaty and compute thee admissible tax credit separately for each jurisdiction-Matter remanded. [S. 37(1), 90(3), 280Z, A297(2)(k), General Clauses Act, S 24]
Bank of India v. ACIT (2021) 209 TTJ 301 / 197 DTR 134 (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 80P : Co-operative societies-Interest and dividend income-Directed the Assessing Officer to consider de novo and to verify whether assessee had deducted tax at source on interest payment to non-members exceeding Rs. 10,000 per annum. [S. 80P(2)(a)(i), 80P(4)]
Shri Shankarling Co-Operative Credit Souharda Sahakari Niyamit v. ITO (2021) 91 ITR 57. (SN) (Bang.)(Trib.)
S. 80P : Co-operative societies-Souhardasahakari Registered Under Karnataka Souharda Co-Operative Act, 1997-Eligible For Deduction [S. 2(19), 80P(2)(a)(i)]
ITO v. Pavagada Souharda Multi Purpose Co-Operative Ltd. (2021) 91 ITR 16 (SN) (Bang.)(Trib.)
S. 80P : Co-operative societies-Souhardasahakari Registered Under Karnataka Souharda Co-Operative Act, 1997-Eligible For Deduction [S. 2(19), 80P(2)(a)(i)]
ITO v. Pavagada Souharda Multi Purpose Co-Operative Ltd. (2021) 91 ITR 16 (SN) (Bang.)(Trib.)
S. 80P : Co-operative societies-Return filed in the status of firm-Rectification application moved to change the status as an AOP and for allowing the claim u/s. 80P of the Act-Conditions of section 80A(5) is not satisfied-Denial of deduction is valid. [S. 80A(5), 80P(2)(a)(i), 143(1), 154]
Shree Datta Prasad Sahakari Patsanstha Ltd. v. ITO (2021) 213 TTJ 617 / 205 DTR 337 / (2022) 193 ITD 285 (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 80IC : Special category States-Estimate of GP at 40 percent of total turnover as against GP disclosed at 57-01 percent-Taxed difference of 17.01 as income from other sources and denied the exemption-Order of CIT(A) is affirmed. [S. 56, 145 (3)]
Sheo Shakti Coke Industries v. ACIT (2021) 91 ITR 231 / (2022) 192 ITD 463 (Kol.)(Trib.)