This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S.147: Reassessment – After the expiry of four years – No failure to disclose material facts – Change of opinion – Capital gains or business income – Sale of shares – Reassessment proceedings are quashed. [ S. 28(i), 45, 148, 154, Art 226 ]
Tata Sons Limited v. Dy.CIT (Bom) (HC)) www.itatonline.org
S.147: Reassessment – After the expiry of four years – No failure to disclose material facts – Information based on search of third party – Reason recorded not indicated anywhere or any stretch of imagination the income has escaped assessment – Non application of mind by the sanctioning authority – Observed that the Assessing Officers will record better reasons for reopening and the Authority granting approval will also apply their mind sincerely before granting approval – Re assessment proceedings was quashed [ S. 148, 151, Art 226 ]
Nirmal Bnag Securities Pvt Ltd v. ACIT (Bom) (HC) www.itatonline.org
S. 276CC : Offences and prosecutions-Failure to furnish return of income-Failure to file the return on due date-Wilful attempt to evade tax-Presumption of culpable mind-Burden is on the assessee to prove that the failure was not wilful. [S. 276C, 278E, Form No 26AS, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, S. 482]
Raman Krishna Kumar v. DCIT (2021) 439 ITR 521 /131 taxmann.com 341 / (2022) 284 Taxman 108 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 215 : Interest payable by assessee-Waiver of interest-Regular assessment means first order / original assessment-Delay not attributable to the assessee the interest is not leviable. [S. 139(8), 143(3), 144, 215(3) ITR, 1962, Rule, 40(1)]
Bennett Coleman & Co. Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2022) 441 ITR 25/ 211 DTR 227/ 325 CTR 545 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Notice issued to non-existing entity-Notice invalid-Notice could not be corrected u/s. 292B of the Act. [S. 292B, Art. 226]
Implenia Services and Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (Bom.)(HC) (UR)
S. 148 : Reassessment-Assessment processed u/s. 143(1)-Fresh claim of loss in reassessment proceedings-Held to be allowable-Deletion of Explanation to section 143 from 1-6-1999, intimation under section 143(1) ceases to be an order for purposes of section 264. [S. 143(1), 147, 264]
Karnataka State Co-Operative Apex Bank Ltd. v. DCIT (2021) 283 Taxman 98 (2022) 211 DTR 63/ 325 CTR 212 (Karn.)(HC).Editorial: Notice issued in SLP filed by the Revenue , Dy. CIT v. Karnataka State Co-op Apex Bank Ltd. (2022) 287 Taxman 165/ 114 CCH 357 (SC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-Within four years-Reasons based on erroneous and incorrect facts-Non application of mind-Notice was quashed. [S. 143(1), 148, 151 Art. 226]
Dhiren Anantraj Modi v. ITO (The Chamber’s Journal-January-P. 73 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-Within four years-Change of opinion-Long term Capital gains-Applicability of Rate of tax at 10% or 20%-Examined in the original assessment proceedings-Reassessment is bad in law. [S. 48, 112, 148, Art. 226]
Conopco Inc v. UOI (2022) ( 2022 ) 285 Taxman 472/ 215 DTR 283/ 329 CTR 773 /BCAJ-January-P. 47 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Recorded reasons must indicate the manner in which the Assessing Officer has come to the conclusion that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment-Reason recorded cannot be substituted-Reassessment Notice was quashed. [S. 148, Art. 226]
Peninsula Land Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 439 ITR 582 / (2022) 134 taxmann.com 33 / 284 Taxman 556 (Bom.)(HC)