Dismissing the appeal,of the revenue court held that the findings of fact recorded by the Tribunal in its order could not be termed perverse or contrary to the evidence on record. The order of the Tribunal holding that none of the reasons set out by the Principal Commissioner for invoking the jurisdiction under section 263 were sustainable and accordingly quashing the order of the Principal Commissioner was affirmed.(AY. 2017-18)
PCIT v. Dineshchandra Narharishankar Upadhyay (2025) 482 ITR 350 /173 taxmann.com 835 (Guj)(HC) Editorial : SLP dismissed, PCIT v. Dineshchandra Narharishankar Upadhyay (2025) 304 Taxman 609 / 482 ITR 359 (SC)
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Long term capital gains-Order of Tribunal affirmed.[S. 45, 54F, 260A]
Leave a Reply