Dismissing the appeal of the revenue, the Court held that more than 11 years had passed since the time the assessment order was passed, and if the date of filing of the return were taken into account, there was a 14 year time gap. The proposal for commencing penalty proceedings was submitted by the Joint Commissioner on March 27, 2019. The record showed that the order under section 271(1)(c) of the Act was passed only on October 31, 2019, which was a date well beyond six months, that expired on September 30, 2019. The order levying a penalty was not valid. Order of Tribunal affirmed. (AY. 2005-06)
PCIT v. Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd (2025) 483 ITR 109 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 275 : Penalty-Bar of limitation-Concealment-Penalty should be levied within a reasonable time-Order levying penalty eleven years after passing of assessment order and fourteen years after return-Held to be not valid. [S. 271(1)(c), 275(1)(c)] was filed Not valid-Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 275(1)(c).
Leave a Reply