The AO disallowed the entire purchases on the ground that the assessee ha obtained bogus purchase bills from entry provider on the basis of information from sales tax department . On appeal the CIT (A) has confirmed addition of two per cent. of the purchase amount as profit. On appeal the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to make a further addition of three per cent. On appeal by the revenue dismissing the appeal the Court held that the Tribunal has observed that the assessee’s gross profit varied from five per cent. to 8.77 per cent. Since the purchases were made from the grey market, the corresponding profit element would be little higher. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to make a further addition of three per cent. on the bogus purchases and to estimate the income on such basis. There was no error or infirmity in the order of the Tribunal. ( AY.2010-11)
PCIT v. Rishabhdev Technocable Ltd. (2020) 424 ITR 338 /187 DTR 473 (Bom)(HC)
S.144: Best judgment assessment – Bogus purchases -Hawala entries -Sales tax department – Income from undisclosed sources — Estimate of profits at 5% of bogus based is held to be justified [ S.142(1) ]