PCIT v. Weedo Ventures (P.) Ltd. (2024) 301 Taxman 624 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v. Weedo Ventures (P.) Ltd. (2024)167 taxmann.com 614(Cal)(HC)

S. 143(2) : Assessment-Notice –Assessing Officer, ITO Ward-5(3), Kolkata issued a notice under section 143(2)-Assessing Officer, ITO Ward-9(2), Kolkata completed assessment without issuing notice under section 143(2) –Additional ground-Order is bad in law –Tax effect is less than 1, 50,0000-SLP of revenue is dismissed as failure to explain the delay of 477 days. [S. 143(3), Art. 136]

Assessee raised additional ground before Tribunal challenging jurisdiction of Assessing Officer.  Tribunal held that passing of assessment order under section 143(3), without issuing notice under section 143(2) is bad in law and. On appeal the  Revenue contended that legal issue was not raised by assessee at earliest point of time namely, before Assessing Officer nor before Commissioner (Appeals). High Court  held that assessee could not be prevented from raising question of jurisdiction which is an issue which goes to root of matter and, Tribunal had rightly permitted assessee to canvas issue and also rightly concluded that assessment was bad in law.  SLP filed by revenue against order of High Court is dismissed  as the Revenue could not explain the delay of 477 days and also Tax effect is less than 1, 50,0000.   (AY. 2011-12)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*