During year under consideration, assessee made investments in foreign companies from which dividend income was received which was taxable. Assessee contended that investments in foreign companies be excluded while applying the provision of section 14A and also contended that investments in Indian companies from which no dividend income was received during year be excluded while computing disallowance of expenditure. The AO disallowed expenses invoking rule 8D(2)(iii) by applying 0.5 per cent of average investment. Tribunal held that investments in Indian companies which did not yield exempt income during year could not be included while computing disallowance of expenditure. Matter remanded. (AY. 2007-08, 2009-10)
Pentamedia Graphics Ltd. v. DCIT (2020) 80 ITR 555/185 ITD 45/190 DTR 391/205 TTJ 892 (Chennai)(Trib.)
S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Investments in Indian companies which did not yielded exempt dividend income-Excluded while computing disallowance. [R. 8D(2)(iii)]