Petronet V. K. Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2025) 475 ITR 494 (Guj)(HC)

S. 32 : Depreciation-Pipeline installation-Contingent liability
Disallowance justified where liability towards port authorities was contingent and not crystallized-No substantial question of law. [S. 260A]

The assessee, engaged in laying petroleum pipelines, claimed depreciation including liability of Rs. 20 crores payable to KPT and GMB. AO disallowed Rs. 5 crores depreciation, holding the liability contingent. CIT(A) and Tribunal upheld disallowance. Dismissing appeal, the High Court held that no contractual payment was made, nor liability accepted by port authorities; hence it was only a contingent liability. Findings being concurrent factual findings, no substantial question of law arose.(AY.2003-04)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*