Prakash Khatri v. PCIT (2024) 115 ITR 1 (SN)(Ahd)(Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Cash credits-Sale of property-Showing company as seller-26AS showing tax deducted at source-Sub-Registrar’s Letter stating no sale transaction is specified-Incorrect income calculation rectifiable-Revision order is quashed. [S. 154]

Held, that the sale of property is  not done by the assessee, but V, whose relevant form 26AS was also produced confirming the buyer’s deduction of tax at source at 1 per cent.  The sale deed showed that the assessee’s name was nowhere reflected in the registered sale deed. In addition, the letter from the Sub-Registrar stated that on that specified date there was no property transaction made by the assessee. Revision order is quashed. AY. 2019-20)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*