Question And Answer
Subject: DISCRIMINATION
Category: 
Querist: MOTI
Answered by:
Tags: ,
Date: November 18, 2022
Query asked by MOTI

THREE CO-OWNERS PURCHASED A PLOT OF LAND IN 2012 AND IT WAS SOLD IN 2017. ALL OF THEM DECLARED THE INCOME IN THEIR RETURNS WHICH WERE ACCEPTED U/S 143 (1) .  NOW IN ONE CASE , THE ASSESSMENT IS REOPENED U/S 148 AND COST IS DISALLOWED AS PURCHASE DOCUMENT WAS NOT REGISTERED. IS THIS CORRECT ?  PLEASE CITE CASE LAW, IF ANY BECAUSE IN OTHER 2 CASES ASSESSMENT HAS NOT BEEN REOPENED.

File Uploaded: Not Available


Merely because the other two cases have not been reopened, cannot be a ground for challenge. The Department is entitled to reopen files and enquire into transactions made by the assessee. The Assessee will have to demonstrate the purchase of land by furnishing a copy of bank statements and other documents.



Disclaimer: This article is only for general information and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers desiring legal advice should consult with an experienced professional to understand the current law and how it may apply to the facts of their case. Neither the author nor itatonline.org and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any inaccurate or incomplete information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. No part of this document should be distributed or copied (except for personal, non-commercial use) without express written permission of itatonline.org

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*